Question

A stockbroker is interested in the factors influencing the rate of return on the common stock of banks. For a sample of 30 banks, the following regression was estimated by least squares: $$ \begin{aligned} & \hat{y}=2.37+\underset{(0.39)}{0.84 x_1}+\underset{(0.12)}{0.15 x_2}-\underset{(0.09)}{0.13 x_3} \\ & +1.67 x_4 \quad R^2=0.317 \\ & \end{aligned} $$ where $y=$ percentage rate of return on common stock of bank $x_1=$ percentage rate of growth of bank's earnings $x_2=$ percentage rate of growth of bank's assets $x_3=$ loan losses as percentage of bank's assets $x_4=1$ if bank head office is in New York City and 0 otherwise The numbers below the coefficients are the coefficient standard errors. a. Interpret the estimated coefficient on $x_4$. b. Interpret the coefficient of determination, and use it to test the null hypothesis that, taken as a group, the four independent variables do not linearly influence the dependent variable. c. Let $e_i$ denote the residuals from the fitted regression and $\hat{y}_i$ the in-sample predicted values of the dependent variable. The least squares regression of $e_i^2$ on $\hat{y}_i$ yielded coefficient of determination 0.082 . What can be concluded from this finding?

   A stockbroker is interested in the factors influencing the rate of return on the common stock of banks. For a sample of 30 banks, the following regression was estimated by least squares:
$$
\begin{aligned}
& \hat{y}=2.37+\underset{(0.39)}{0.84 x_1}+\underset{(0.12)}{0.15 x_2}-\underset{(0.09)}{0.13 x_3} \\
& +1.67 x_4 \quad R^2=0.317 \\
&
\end{aligned}
$$
where
$y=$ percentage rate of return on common stock of bank
$x_1=$ percentage rate of growth of bank's earnings
$x_2=$ percentage rate of growth of bank's assets
$x_3=$ loan losses as percentage of bank's assets
$x_4=1$ if bank head office is in New York City and 0 otherwise
The numbers below the coefficients are the coefficient standard errors.
a. Interpret the estimated coefficient on $x_4$.
b. Interpret the coefficient of determination, and use it to test the null hypothesis that, taken as a group, the four independent variables do not linearly influence the dependent variable.
c. Let $e_i$ denote the residuals from the fitted regression and $\hat{y}_i$ the in-sample predicted values of the dependent variable. The least squares regression of $e_i^2$ on $\hat{y}_i$ yielded coefficient of determination 0.082 . What can be concluded from this finding?
Show more…
Statistics for Business and Economics: Global Edition
Statistics for Business and Economics: Global Edition
Newbold P., Carlson… 8th Edition
Chapter 13, Problem 49 ↓

Instant Answer

verified

Step 1

- The coefficient for \(x_4\) is 1.67. Since \(x_4\) is a dummy variable indicating whether the bank's head office is in New York City (1 if yes, 0 otherwise), a coefficient of 1.67 suggests that, all else being equal, banks headquartered in New York City have an  Show more…

Show all steps

lock
AceChat toggle button
Close icon
Ace pointing down

Please give Ace some feedback

Your feedback will help us improve your experience

Thumb up icon Thumb down icon
Thanks for your feedback!
Profile picture
A stockbroker is interested in the factors influencing the rate of return on the common stock of banks. For a sample of 30 banks, the following regression was estimated by least squares: $$ \begin{aligned} & \hat{y}=2.37+\underset{(0.39)}{0.84 x_1}+\underset{(0.12)}{0.15 x_2}-\underset{(0.09)}{0.13 x_3} \\ & +1.67 x_4 \quad R^2=0.317 \\ & \end{aligned} $$ where $y=$ percentage rate of return on common stock of bank $x_1=$ percentage rate of growth of bank's earnings $x_2=$ percentage rate of growth of bank's assets $x_3=$ loan losses as percentage of bank's assets $x_4=1$ if bank head office is in New York City and 0 otherwise The numbers below the coefficients are the coefficient standard errors. a. Interpret the estimated coefficient on $x_4$. b. Interpret the coefficient of determination, and use it to test the null hypothesis that, taken as a group, the four independent variables do not linearly influence the dependent variable. c. Let $e_i$ denote the residuals from the fitted regression and $\hat{y}_i$ the in-sample predicted values of the dependent variable. The least squares regression of $e_i^2$ on $\hat{y}_i$ yielded coefficient of determination 0.082 . What can be concluded from this finding?
Close icon
Play audio
Feedback
Powered by NumerAI
*

Labs

-

Want to see this concept in action?

NEW

Explore this concept interactively to see how it behaves as you change inputs.

View Labs

*

Key Concepts

-
Detection of Heteroscedasticity through Regression of Squared Residuals
Heteroscedasticity refers to the circumstance where the variance of the errors is not constant across observations, which can affect the validity of standard statistical tests. One diagnostic approach involves regressing the squared residuals from the fitted model on the predicted values to see if there's a systematic pattern. A low R-squared in this auxiliary regression suggests that there is little evidence of heteroscedasticity in the error term variance.
Standard Errors and Hypothesis Testing of Regression Coefficients
Standard errors in regression provide an estimate of the sampling variability of the coefficient estimates. They are used to construct confidence intervals and conduct hypothesis tests (using t-statistics) to determine whether individual predictors have a statistically significant relationship with the dependent variable.
Coefficient of Determination (R-squared) and Overall Significance Testing
The coefficient of determination, R-squared, quantifies the proportion of variability in the dependent variable that is explained by the independent variables in the model. It is a measure of overall model fit. To test whether the predictors, taken together, have a statistically significant effect on the dependent variable, an F-test is commonly used under the null hypothesis that all regression coefficients (except the intercept) are zero.
Dummy Variable in Regression Analysis
In regression analysis, dummy variables are used to represent categorical data by coding categories as 0 and 1. The coefficient on a dummy variable measures the expected difference in the dependent variable between the group coded as 1 and the baseline group (coded as 0), while holding all other variables constant.

*

Recommended Videos

-
43-multiple-regression-was-used-to-explain-stock-returns-using-the-following-variables-dependent-variable-ret-annual-stock-returns-turn-over-14-may-2021-fri96-49-time-series-analysis-and-for-10293

(4.3) Multiple regression was used to explain stock returns using the following variables: Dependent variable: RET = annual stock returns (%) Independent variables: MKT = market capitalization (per million $) IND = industry quartile ranking (IND = 4 is the highest ranking) FORT = Fortune 500 firm, where FORT = 1 if the stock is that of a Fortune 500 firm, and FORT = 0 if not a Fortune 500 srock. The regression results are presented in the table below: Coefficient Std Error t-statistic p-value Intercept 0.5220 1.2100 0.430 0.681 Market capitalization 0.0460 0.0150 3.090 0.021 Industry ranking 0.7102 0.2725 2.610 0.040 Fortune 500 0.9000 0.5281 1.700 0.139 (a) Based on the results in the table, which of the following most accurately represents the regression equation? Justify your answer. A. 0.43 + 3.09(MKT) + 2.61(IND) + 1.70(FORT) B. 0.681 + 0.021(MKT) + 0.041(IND) + 0.139(FORT) C. 1.21 + 0.015(MKT) + 0.2725(IND) + 0.5281(FORT) D. 0.522 + 0.046(MKT) + 0.7102(IND) + 0.9(FORT) (b) What is the closest value to the expected amount of the stock return attributable to it being a Fortune 500 stock? Justify your answer. (4.4) You built a linear regression model to analyze annual salaries for a developed country. You incorporated two independent variables, age and experience, into your model. Upon reading the regression results, you notice that the coefficient of experience is negative, which appears to be counter-intuitive. In addition you have discovered that the coefficients have low t-statistics but the regression model has a high R^2. What is the most likely cause for these results? Justify your answer. A. Multicollinearity B. Serial correlation C. Heteroskedasticity D. Incorrect standard errors

Need help? Use Ace
Ace is your personal tutor. It breaks down any question with clear steps so you can learn.
Start Using Ace
Ace is your personal tutor for learning
Step-by-step explanations
Instant summaries
Summarize YouTube videos
Understand textbook images or PDFs
Study tools like quizzes and flashcards
Listen to your notes as a podcast
Continue solving this problem
Create a free account to:
  • View full step-by-step solution
  • Ask follow-up questions with Ace AI
  • Save progress and study later
Continue Free
Numerade

Get step-by-step video solution
from top educators

Continue with Clever
or



By creating an account, you agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
Already have an account? Log In

A free answer
just for you

Watch the video solution with this free unlock.

Numerade

Log in to watch this video
...and 100,000,000 more!


EMAIL

PASSWORD

OR
Continue with Clever