00:01
For this problem.
00:01
We are told that a study at the university of colorado, excuse me colorado at boulder shows that running increases the percent resting metabolic rate, or rmr in older women, we have that the average rmr of 30 elderly women runners was 34% higher than the average rmr of 30 sedentary elderly women.
00:23
So we can see we can say that x1 bar equals x two bar plus 34.
00:30
And we have that the standard deviations were reported to be 10.5 and 10.2% respectively.
00:36
So sigma one equals 10.5 in sigma two equals 10.2.
00:42
Were then asked.
00:43
Was there a significant increase in rmr of the women runners over the sedentary women so particularly were being asked, is it possible? or is it true that μ one is significantly greater than you two.
00:58
We then have that we assume the populations to be approximately normally distributed with equal variances.
01:05
And we are to use a p value in our conclusions.
01:09
So here the null hypothesis is that μ one is equal to μ two, and the alternative hypothesis is going to be that μ one is greater than you two.
01:21
So actually we can change the first or the null hypothesis to less than or equal to.
01:26
So, what we have then that we want to calculate the value when we're comparing two different samples, which would be equal to x 1 -12 divided by or excuse me? x one minus x two.
01:43
X one bar minus x two bar.
01:45
Oh, actually also slightly change how i'm writing the null hypothesis here.
01:52
So if they know hypothesis is that the distance or the difference between these is zero.
02:00
We can write that μ 1 -92 equals d.
02:05
Which in turn equals zero.
02:06
And then the alternative hypothesis is that μ one is greater than you two...