00:03
We are given a data set of x and y coordinate pairs, and we're tasked with using a graphing utility to graph the data and determine some things about the correlation.
00:15
So first off, this was done using excel, and excel not only made us this nice scatterplot, but it also, using the correlation function, calculated for us that the r value is negative 0 .98022.
00:30
Furthermore, we were able to determine our equation for the line of best fit.
00:36
And so we have what we need here.
00:39
The next task we had was to figure out what the value of the y would be if x is zero, negative 6, 12, or negative 15.
00:53
And of course, we can only do that if the data is reasonably predictive for that x value.
00:59
So if x is zero, that would put us right about there at negative 12.
01:05
And since zero is within the range of x values of our actual data, and our lowest x value was negative 20, and our highest x value was one.
01:17
So anything in between there, it's clearly okay, and anything beyond needs to be very, very close.
01:24
So f of zero is what we get when we substitute zero into, our equation here.
01:31
So this one's pretty straightforward.
01:33
You don't need a calculator for it.
01:35
Looking at the graph, we can see it's about negative 12.
01:38
And in fact, our slope times zero is zero.
01:41
And all that's left is the y intercept, which is negative 11 .9 .9.
01:53
And our next one, negative six, negative six is inside that range of x's.
01:59
So negative six is right about there.
02:02
And that would put us, but halfway between negative 4 and negative 5.
02:07
So if we don't fumble with the calculator, we should get something in the neighborhood of negative 4 .5.
02:12
So let's go ahead and calculate that one.
02:15
So f of negative 6 is going to equal negative 1 .2 -631 times negative 6 minus 11 .97.
02:38
And the calculator says that equals negative 4 .404.
02:49
So that's pretty close to negative 4 .5.
02:52
We'll assume we did not fumble on the calculator.
02:55
F of 12, 12 is so much larger than 2, which is the highest x value we had for our actual data...