00:01
Hi, everyone.
00:01
Today we're going to be solving problem three from chapter 20, which discusses utilitarianism.
00:07
And it asks us what a utilitarian would believe about the redistribution of income.
00:13
So to start off, we're going to define utilitarianism, which is the political philosophy that any government should choose policies that will maximize the total utility of everyone in a society.
00:25
And utilitarian define utility as the level of happiness of each person.
00:34
So part of the utilitarian approach is that the government should redistribute income to make income inequality less, and it rests on this idea of diminishing marginal utility.
00:46
So basically, utilitarians believe that if you have two people, one person who's earning $100 ,000 each year, and one person that's earning $20 ,000 each year, if you take away $1 from the richer person and you give it to the poor person, that $1 is going to mean a lot more to the poorer person versus taking it away from the rich person because the rich person has so much money that $1 is not going to hurt them that much, but for the poor person, $1 is going to help them more.
01:17
And so basically, this is the idea of diminishing marginal utility.
01:21
And because of this phenomenon, on utilitarians believe that there should be redistribution of income and a good amount of it.
01:29
However, they also believe that there should be a, there's a tipping point where redistribution of income should stop.
01:38
And this brings us back to our question.
01:42
So basically there is such a thing as too much redistribution for utilitarians.
01:47
They believe that, for example, the us has redistribution policies and they believe that sometimes, these policies can go too far.
01:55
So the u .s., for example, has two redistribution policies.
01:59
They have taxation, which basically means that as you get richer and richer, you're going to be taxed more and more...