00:01
Part 1.
00:04
This is the estimated auto -regression first order model.
00:13
We regress unemployment with its first lag.
00:21
And we will use this estimated equation to predict the value of unemployment rate in 2004, given the unemployment rate in 2003.
00:37
In 2003, the unemployment rate was 6.
00:45
So if you plug 6 in here, you will get unemployment rate in 2004 as 5 .94.
01:05
From the 2005 economic report of the president, table b -42, the us civilian unemployment rate was 5 .5.
01:24
So the equation here over predicts the 2004 unemployment rate by almost half a percentage point.
01:55
In part 2, we add inflation of the previous period into the right -hand side of the equation.
02:11
We find that the lag inflation is very statistically significant.
02:17
It has a high t statistic value, which is about 4 .7.
02:54
Part 3.
02:55
We use the equation from part 2 to predict unemployment rate in 2004.
03:03
Again, we know that unemployment rate in 2003 is 6, and from their data set, we know inflation rate in 2003 was 2 .3.
03:19
Plug these numbers into the estimated equation here.
03:28
You will get unemployment in 2004 as 5 .61.
03:39
It is still larger than the actual unemployment rate of 5 .5, but it is much closer to the real rate, comparing to our prediction in part 1.
03:58
We get 5 .94 in part one.
04:08
In part four, we will construct a 95 % confidence interval for our predicted unemployment rate.
04:25
We will assume that unemployment follows a conditional normal distribution.
04:33
And to construct the confidence interval, we need centered error of predicted value, which i denote as e of y0...