00:01
What's up, stat cats? this is problem 19.
00:04
It says, an educator believes that new reading activities for elementary school children will improve reading comprehension scores.
00:12
She randomly assigns third graders to an eight -week program in which some will use these activities and others will experience traditional teaching methods.
00:21
At the end of the experiment, both groups take a reading comprehension exam.
00:25
Their scores are shown in the back -to -back stem and leaf display.
00:29
Do these results? suggest that the new activities are better.
00:33
Test an appropriate hypothesis and state your conclusion.
00:37
All right.
00:38
So just looking at these, can see that both the groups are roughly normally distributed.
00:48
It does look like the average for the new activities is a little higher than in the control group, but i really can't say for sure either way.
00:59
So let's go ahead and write down.
01:01
Our null and alternative hypotheses.
01:06
So the null is that the mean difference for our new activities minus the mean difference of our control is going to equal zero, and the alternative hypothesis is that mean difference is going to be greater than zero.
01:26
So let's go ahead and take this data and i have entered it into an excel spreadsheet and i have done the preliminary calculations of the mean, standard deviation, and sample size.
01:44
So now we can pull out our calculator and we can hit the stat button and we're going to go over to tests...