00:01
For this problem on the topic of electrostatics, we have a vacuum diode where electrons are boiled off a hot cathode at potential zero and then accelerated across the gap to the anode.
00:12
This is held at a positive potential v0 and a cloud of moving electrons within the gap quickly builds to a point where it reduces the field at the surface of the cathode to zero.
00:22
We then have a steady current flowing between the plates.
00:27
And if we suppose that the plates are large relative to the separation so that the edge of x can be neglected then we are asked to find poisson's equation for the region between the plates and then find the speed of the electrons at point x where the potential is v of x we then want to find the relationship between row and v and then use these results to obtain an differential equation for v by eliminating in row and v.
00:54
We then want to solve this equation for v as a function of x, and then plot v of x and compare to the potential without the space charge.
01:02
And lastly, we want to show that i is equal to k times v0 of the power 3 over 2.
01:08
So for a, we have nabler squared of v is equal to minus row over epsilon not, which is poisson's equation.
01:23
And so this is simply d2v, d x squared equal to minus 1 over epsilon 0 times the charge distribution row.
01:40
For part b, we have q times v equal to a half mv squared.
01:49
So the electric potential energy is equal to the kinetic energy and rearranging, we find the speed of the electrons v to be the square root of 2q times the potential big v over the mass of the particles m.
02:09
For part c we have infinitesimal charge unit dq equal to the area a times the charge density row times dx which we can write as a times row times dx d t which is the area a times row times v, which is equal to the current, which is constant.
02:46
For part d, we have the second derivative of the potential with respect to x, d2v, the x squared, equal to minus 1 over epsilon knot times row, which is minus 1 over epsilon 0 times i over av.
03:05
And this is equal to minus i over epsilon not a times the square root of m divided by 2 q v therefore implies that d2v d x squared is equal to beta v to the minus a half where we have beta here to be minus i over epsilon naught a times the square root of m over 2 q...