artificial-intelligence-refers-to-________-a-tutorials-that-can-make-humans-smarter-than-they-natura

Question

Artificial intelligence refers to ________.
A. tutorials that can make humans smarter than they naturally are
B. programming computers to mimic human reasoning and perform tasks previously performed by humans
C. humans that do not possess reasonably high IQs
D. a concept that exists only in science fiction but has not yet been achieved today

Alyssa Mae L. · Accepted Answer

So the question being asked is, what is fluid intelligence characterized by were given four options. And just to know that I omitted from writing being able to before every single option given just so it doesn&#x27;t take up space. Um, And I think just going forward with this question with the understanding that it is asking about a specific type of intelligence, we could kind of assume that these other options must elude or be connected to a different type of intelligence as well and understanding that the best way to go about this is tryingto take an educated guess or even eliminate based off of what we know on the specific types of intelligences and haven&#x27;t help us figure out what the right answer is. So I&#x27;m gonna start with starting to I&#x27;m going to start with our first option, often a and that&#x27;s being able to recall info. And I feel like this is the most broad explanation in terms of intelligence, and it is what we kind of think about when we first think about intelligence. And we describe someone whose intelligence it&#x27;s someone who knows a lot of things. But in addition to knowing a lot of things. It&#x27;s being able to retrieve that out of memory easily. And the this kind of stereotypical form of understanding intelligence is alluding to crystallized intelligence, and, by definition, crystallized intelligence is simply being able to acquire knowledge and readily retrieve that information. Oh, and by the way, I am abbreviating intelligence again for special purposes. So we call in Bo equals crystallized intelligence, making that not her answer following We have been able to create new products, and this options pretty ambiguous because of how subjective the term products is. But if I were to take a pretty educated guess as to what specific type of intelligence this option would be alluding to, my best bet would be creative. Intelligence and creative intelligence is defined by the imagining or inventing of, um, a solution, whether it be to a circumstance or problem that that one is faced with when they are pretty high in terms of creative intelligence, to able to not only quickly think of inventions or uhm means off original ideas to solve the problem, but they&#x27;re able to create that and make it applicable to this situation. So what I&#x27;m thinking is that byproducts this question. This option, I should say, is mainly alluding to a solution. So that&#x27;s why my best that for this, um, option us to what the what happened. Intelligence is being defined would be creative intelligence, however, because it&#x27;s so ambiguous, and I&#x27;m not entirely sure I&#x27;m not going to eliminate it right away. That&#x27;s a moving forward. We have been able to understand and communicate with different cultures. What&#x27;s easy. But this one is. You have a keyword, which is cultures, and there&#x27;s a separate intelligence that it&#x27;s briefly mentioned called cultural intelligence. And that&#x27;s basically being able to recognize and dwell and adopt two different cultures. And because of that, it&#x27;s simply called cultural intelligence. So when we&#x27;re talking about intelligence and you see the word culture, you&#x27;re most likely dealing with cultural intelligence. Also not making this a right answer, leaving us with the to be or being able to see complex relationships and solve problems. So this is another broadly speaking sort of intelligence, and it is part of the sort of stereotypical intelligent Um, I guess I want to say stigma because it was obviously has a negative connotation, but rather the idea we usually think of when we think of, um, intelligence. And in addition to being able to recall in phone acquire knowledge readily, it&#x27;s being able to see beyond what is average. You see more than the super several and you see complex and able to use these interconnections relationships help you solve your problems. And what this gives away is that, like crystallized intelligence, you&#x27;re talking about a very broadly speaking sort of intelligence. And there is no other type of intelligence that fits this other than when change the color fluid intelligence, by definition, always out of the book fluid, fluid intelligence is characterized by being able to see complex relationships and problems. And the reason why I talk about how broadly speaking it is is that when we classify intelligence, we initially think of crystallized intelligence, which is based on readily fax and fluid intelligence, which is based on scene beyond those facts and sorting connections between the two. And I kind of think of it as, like crystallized. You have crystals. We have solid, solid fax fluid. Is something loose something, um, obviously less solid, and that&#x27;s kind of connective, or that resonates with the whole not really sticking to the facts and easily flowing between certain ideas and having that connect. And that&#x27;s how I remembered the difference between crystallized intelligence and fluid intelligence that being sad D is our right answer. Mm. And But going back Teoh option being being able to create new products had he been a sort of ambiguous answer? When we think of fluid intelligence, we only think of, um, being able to stall problems rather than create new products. Have it pat, it said. Create new products to solve problems than you would have had a more difficult time differentiating between the better answer but because option B doesn&#x27;t really allude to any sort of problem solving or complexity, and it&#x27;s safe to say that the is the better answer.

Dennis Howard · Answer

in this question, we are looking for the answer choice that is not going to be part off Gardner&#x27;s theory of multiple intelligences. So we have quite a few different intelligences that are going to the part of Gardner&#x27;s theory. Okay, so we have gardeners theory, and we will list out the different intelligences. So we have linguistic intelligence. We will have logical mathematical intelligence. Okay, there&#x27;s also going to be musical along with visual spatial. There will be bodily kinesthetic. There will also be interpersonal. And finally, there will also be intra personal. Okay, so which answer choice will not be part of this list? Well, looking at our answer choices fluid intelligence choice A is not part of this list and fluid intelligence, actually just to define it. It will consist of problem solving skills, so that is actually why it&#x27;s fluid because it&#x27;s not a set intelligence. It&#x27;s a use of your knowledge in various different fields to solve a problem. So that&#x27;s problem solving skills that are represented by fluid intelligence. So this is not part of gardeners seven multiple intelligences that we have listed out here. Instead, it&#x27;s ah, separate category in and of itself. That is why choice A is going to be the correct answer choice

Alyssa Mae L. · Answer

right. So the question being asked is Arthur Jensen. Believe that Blank. We&#x27;re going four options and end of the screen before you. The eyeless did I kind of abbreviated on the definitions, But that&#x27;s not to say that every word is important when looking at this. But just to go over a is genetics was solely responsible for intelligence. Be his environment was solely responsible for intelligence. See is intelligence level was determined by race, and D. Ike Ude has do not take socio economic status and to account. And as I mentioned in previous videos, the thing about questions that are asking about certain psychologists whether they be part of the question or part of the answer is that was difficult is that you can&#x27;t their names really don&#x27;t give away a lot about what they&#x27;re credited to, and to really understand, or to really be able to answer these kind of questions is just to know and really remember who did what. So it is. Get looking at the option that were given what really stands out to you and not really belonging in sort of the conversation about intelligence, it is D which states that I Q test do not take socioeconomic status into account. And although yeah, this is talking about intelligence, the other options are talking about are talking about the the determination of intelligence. However, the I Q is really getting out the measurement of intelligence and that is not taken into account or the I Q test. Specifically, don&#x27;t take into account socioeconomic status. And when looking at this, it&#x27;s important to remember that, um, Arthur Jensen, if we could if we were to label him with a specific, um, I should say, I guess identify Air is, um he was really concerned with the influences and foundations of intelligence. Although he utilized I q test to study or to studying research what he was interested in, he wasn&#x27;t concerned with the measurements of the I Q test. So looking at this, the I Q test doesn&#x27;t take into account. Socioeconomic status isn&#x27;t something that he is credited for. Insane. Also to note that this specific option is on that I Q and so see the connection between socioeconomic status and I. Q. Was studied by Mark Yoshiyama and his colleagues, and that basically their research revealed that Children living in poverty demonstrated. Reduced prefrontal brain functioning compared the Children with damage to the lateral prefrontal cortex. And basically, what this is stain is because of Children who live in poverty, who experienced more stress on worry about basic needs. It really affects their brain functions and, furthermore, their i. Q. So this definitely isn&#x27;t something that Arthur Jensen is connected to leaving us with genetics being solely responsible or genetics and or environment being solely responsible intelligence or the determination of intelligence by race. So Arthur Jensen was really concerned with what influence race, and he publishes Article um titled, How much can we boost I Q and achievement and basically, in order to pursue research, he admitted. It&#x27;s administered I Q test to a pretty diverse group of students. And, um, that allowed him Teoh kind of going to kind of get a gauge in. That intelligence was made up of two types of abilities, level one and level two, level one being responsible for a memorization. While Level two is responsible for conceptual and analytical abilities, the conclusions of his tests revealed that I Q is determined by genetics, However, because of his ability to differentiate between Level one and level two. He was also able to see that Level two exhibited differences among ethnic groups, and he was able to conclude that level to intelligence is prevalent among Asians compared to Caucasians and African Americans. And Jensen was really criticized for racial bias. So with this kind of precursor, Teoh Martha Jensen, we could eliminate B which state that environment was solely responsible for intelligence and relaxed with his initial conclusion that genetics was solely, um um, the terms are solely at this determined by our genetics is solely responsible by intelligence and then the other option C, which his intelligence is determined by race. And I think what&#x27;s important to note was that, um, while Jensen&#x27;s conclusions did exhibit some sort of difference between, um um, ethnic racial groups and that the Level two intelligence was more prevalent and Asians, his conclusion wasn&#x27;t that intelligence with determined by race, he simply stated what his home research revealed, and his initial statement being that accused, determined by genetics, is what we&#x27;re really getting at making a the correct answer

Ernest Castorena · Answer

this time they ask us The brain of the computer is the way it is. The CPU. Well, Ah, by analogy, all our processing is done in the brain. So all the processing of the computer is typically done in the CPU. That&#x27;s the most general place. Processing is done now, all of your programs, when all of the computation actually takes place. The CPU is basically what will be processing later on. There&#x27;ll be other things like GPU are. Maybe they&#x27;ll be some other kind of embedded computation unit, but almost all the time the CPU is it will be running your program called, so make sure the you&#x27;re making the most that you can out of it.

Emily Himsel · Answer

There are four different components of emotional intelligence. The first one is perceiving emotions, and this is when we recognize the emotional states of others. The next one is understanding emotions. Okay? And this is when we understand how emotions change the factors that we can&#x27;t always feeling the same emotion. The third is managing emotions, and this is when we know how we can express emotions depending on the context of the situation. And then the fourth Y is about using emotions for certain purposes. So the one answer choice that is not a component of emotional intelligence is eat. Inventing emotions, can&#x27;t just event emotions.

Problem

Blockchain is a technology that ________. A. is …

Problem 29 Easy Difficulty

Answer

Related Courses

Principles of Accounting Volume 1: Financial Accounting

Related Topics

Discussion

Top Educators

Recommended Videos

Watch More Solved Questions in Chapter 7

Video Transcript

Mitchell Franklin, Patty Graybeal, Dixon Cooper

Principles of Accounting Volume 1: Financial Accounting

What do you need help with?

Textbooks

Ask a question

Courses

AI Tutor

Principles of Accounting Volume 1: Financial Accounting

Mitchell Franklin, Patty Graybeal, Dixon CooperPrinciples of Accounting Volume 1: Financial Accounting

Mitchell Franklin, Patty Graybeal, Dixon Cooper

Principles of Accounting Volume 1: Financial Accounting