Assertion (A) and Reason (R)
(A) Both A and $\mathrm{R}$ are true and $\mathrm{R}$ is the correct explanation of $\mathrm{A}$.
(B) Both $\mathrm{A}$ and $\mathrm{R}$ are true but $\mathrm{R}$ is not the correct explanation of $\mathbf{A}$.
(C) $\mathrm{A}$ is true, $\mathrm{R}$ is false.
(D) $\mathrm{A}$ is false, $\mathrm{R}$ is true.
Assertion $(A):$ If $g(x)$ is a differentiable function $g(2) \neq 0$, $g(-2) \neq 0$ and Rolle's Theorem is not applicable to $f(x)=\frac{x^{2}-4}{g(x)}$ in $[-2,2]$, then $g(x)$ has atleast one root in $(-2,2)$
Reason ( $(\mathrm{R})$ : If a function $\mathrm{f}$ is differentiable in $(\mathrm{a}, \mathrm{b})$ and $f(a)=f(b)$, then Rolle's Theorem is applicable to $f(x)$ for $x \in(a, b)$