00:01
Number 12, this place.
00:03
They say, at this point, the writer is considering adding the following sentence.
00:07
In fact, it was a casual remark by a child that inspired seligman to write the optimistic child.
00:12
Assuming this statement is true, would it be a relevant and appropriate addition to the essay? so these questions that start with two yes answers and two no answers, they're also known as two keeps and two deletes, these are always.
00:31
Intended as focus questions, meaning they're evaluating, does the change that they want to make help to sharpen the focus by staying really strictly on topic, or does it blur the focus by veering off in another direction? so though the reasonings may play with lots of different things, know that ultimately what you're looking for is a matter of focus.
00:56
So we can start by just kind of fact -checking the answer choices.
01:00
F says yes, because it's explains where he got the title for optimistic child.
01:04
This is true.
01:04
Sure, it does explain that.
01:06
Now evaluate it through the lens of focus.
01:09
Is it relevant? well, check the context of the paragraph.
01:14
The paragraph is about martin seligman's work, focusing on the areas of happiness, engagement, and fulfillment.
01:22
The book, the optimistic child, is just thrown out kind of as an example of the books that are accessible to a wide audience of readers.
01:32
There's no real reason why you would go off on a tangent about optimistic child, but not on the other ones.
01:38
So it may be interesting.
01:39
It may be explaining where he got the title...