Question

Balanced scorecard and problems with interpreting performance measures. Soup operates passenger rail services in Deeland, a technologically advanced country. with high demand for fast reliable rail travel from business and leisure passengers. Many passengers choose train travel because they see it as less harmful to the environment than other forms of transport. Soup's main objective is to maximize shareholder wealth. Since becoming licensed to operate routes in Regions A and B by the Deeland government five years ago, Soup has consistently delivered increased dividends and share prices for irvestors. In its initial appraisal of the licensing opportunity. Soup expected to operate the routes for at least 15 years, however, their licence may not be renewed when it expires in three years' time. The government has warned Soup it 'is unhappy about high returns to shareholders while there are many reports of poor passenger service, overcrowded trains and unreliable services on certain routes and at busy times'. that region. The railway track, stations and other infrastructure are managed by the government which charges the operators a fee. There are several stations along the route which are only used by Soup trains and others where Soup trains do not stop at all. Soup's trains are 25 years old, originally purchased cheaply from an operator whose licence was withdrawn by the government. Soup believes the low price it paid is a key competitive advantage enabling them to steadily increase their return on capital employed, the company's main performance measure, to a level well in excess of their rivals. The shareholders are pleased with the growth in passenger numbers over the last five years, which is the other performance measure Soup uses. Soup's ageing trains spend increasing time undergoing preventative maintenance, safety checks or repairs. A recent television documentary also showed apparently poor conditions on board, such as defective heating and washroom facilities and dirty, torn seating. Passengers complained in the program of difficulties finding a seat, the unreliability of accessing wireless internet services and even that the menu in the on-board cafe had not changed for five years. Soup's CEO responded that unreliable internet access arose from the rapid growth in passengers expecting to access the internet on trains. She said Soup had never received any formal complaints about the lack of choice in the on-board cafe, nor had she heard of a recent press report that Soup's trains were badly maintained, so causing harm to the environment. The CEO has asked you, as chief management accountant, for your advice. 'In view of the gowernment's warning, we must develop performance measures balancing the needs of passengers with the requirements of the shareholders', she has said. 'I don't want to know how to improve the actual performance of the business; that is the job of the operational managers, nor do I just want a list of suggested performance measures. Instead I need to know why these performance measures will help to improve the performance of Soup.' The following data applies to Soup: $$ \begin{array}{lrr} & \text { Region A } & \text { Region B } \\ \hline \text { Number of services per day } & & \\ \text { Peak times } & 4 & 4 \\ \text { Other times } & 6 & 8 \\ \text { Number of passengers per day } & & \\ \text { Peak times } & 2,500 & 1,400 \\ \text { Other times } & 2,450 & 1,850 \end{array} $$ Soup owns its fleet of diesel powered trains. Each train in Region A has seven coaches with 70 passenger seats available per coach. In the less busy Region B, each train has six coaches each with 70 seats. As a condition of the licence, Soup runs a set number of services at both busy and quieter times in both regions. Soup has two larger rivals, both operating electric trains, which cause less harm to the environment than diesel powered trains. They run on the same routes in both regions. The government regulates fares charged to passengers, which are the same per distance travelled for every operator in Required: (a) Advise the CEO on how the use of the balanced scorecard could improve the performance management system of Soup. (b) Using the performance data given, evaluate the comments of the Deeland government that Soups trains are overcrowded. (c) Assess the problems Soup may encounter in selecting and interpreting performance measures when applying the balanced scorecard to its performance management system.

   Balanced scorecard and problems with interpreting performance measures. Soup operates passenger rail services in Deeland, a technologically advanced country. with high demand for fast reliable rail travel from business and leisure passengers. Many passengers choose train travel because they see it as less harmful to the environment than other forms of transport.

Soup's main objective is to maximize shareholder wealth. Since becoming licensed to operate routes in Regions A and B by the Deeland government five years ago, Soup has consistently delivered increased dividends and share prices for irvestors. In its initial appraisal of the licensing opportunity. Soup expected to operate the routes for at least 15 years, however, their licence may not be renewed when it expires in three years' time. The government has warned Soup it 'is unhappy about high returns to shareholders while there are many reports of poor passenger service, overcrowded trains and unreliable services on certain routes and at busy times'. that region. The railway track, stations and other infrastructure are managed by the government which charges the operators a fee. There are several stations along the route which are only used by Soup trains and others where Soup trains do not stop at all.

Soup's trains are 25 years old, originally purchased cheaply from an operator whose licence was withdrawn by the government. Soup believes the low price it paid is a key competitive advantage enabling them to steadily increase their return on capital employed, the company's main performance measure, to a level well in excess of their rivals. The shareholders are pleased with the growth in passenger numbers over the last five years, which is the other performance measure Soup uses.

Soup's ageing trains spend increasing time undergoing preventative maintenance, safety checks or repairs. A recent television documentary also showed apparently poor conditions on board, such as defective heating and washroom facilities and dirty, torn seating. Passengers complained in the program of difficulties finding a seat, the unreliability of accessing wireless internet services and even that the menu in the on-board cafe had not changed for five years.

Soup's CEO responded that unreliable internet access arose from the rapid growth in passengers expecting to access the internet on trains. She said Soup had never received any formal complaints about the lack of choice in the on-board cafe, nor had she heard of a recent press report that Soup's trains were badly maintained, so causing harm to the environment.

The CEO has asked you, as chief management accountant, for your advice. 'In view of the gowernment's warning, we must develop performance measures balancing the needs of passengers with the requirements of the shareholders', she has said. 'I don't want to know how to improve the actual performance of the business; that is the job of the operational managers, nor do I just want a list of suggested performance measures. Instead I need to know why these performance measures will help to improve the performance of Soup.'
The following data applies to Soup:
$$
\begin{array}{lrr}
& \text { Region A } & \text { Region B } \\
\hline \text { Number of services per day } & & \\
\text { Peak times } & 4 & 4 \\
\text { Other times } & 6 & 8 \\
\text { Number of passengers per day } & & \\
\text { Peak times } & 2,500 & 1,400 \\
\text { Other times } & 2,450 & 1,850
\end{array}
$$



Soup owns its fleet of diesel powered trains. Each train in Region A has seven coaches with 70 passenger seats available per coach. In the less busy Region B, each train has six coaches each with 70 seats. As a condition of the licence, Soup runs a set number of services at both busy and quieter times in both regions. Soup has two larger rivals, both operating electric trains, which cause less harm to the environment than diesel powered trains. They run on the same routes in both regions.

The government regulates fares charged to passengers, which are the same per distance travelled for every operator in Required:
(a) Advise the CEO on how the use of the balanced scorecard could improve the performance management system of Soup.
(b) Using the performance data given, evaluate the comments of the Deeland government that Soups trains are overcrowded.
(c) Assess the problems Soup may encounter in selecting and interpreting performance measures when applying the balanced scorecard to its performance management system.

Show more…
Management and Cost Accounting
Management and Cost Accounting
Mike Tayles, Colin… 11th Edition
Chapter 21, Problem 23 ↓

Instant Answer

verified

Step 1

It integrates financial measures with other key performance indicators around customer perspectives, business process perspectives, and learning and growth perspectives.  Show more…

Show all steps

lock
AceChat toggle button
Close icon
Ace pointing down

Please give Ace some feedback

Your feedback will help us improve your experience

Thumb up icon Thumb down icon
Thanks for your feedback!
Profile picture
Balanced scorecard and problems with interpreting performance measures. Soup operates passenger rail services in Deeland, a technologically advanced country. with high demand for fast reliable rail travel from business and leisure passengers. Many passengers choose train travel because they see it as less harmful to the environment than other forms of transport. Soup's main objective is to maximize shareholder wealth. Since becoming licensed to operate routes in Regions A and B by the Deeland government five years ago, Soup has consistently delivered increased dividends and share prices for irvestors. In its initial appraisal of the licensing opportunity. Soup expected to operate the routes for at least 15 years, however, their licence may not be renewed when it expires in three years' time. The government has warned Soup it 'is unhappy about high returns to shareholders while there are many reports of poor passenger service, overcrowded trains and unreliable services on certain routes and at busy times'. that region. The railway track, stations and other infrastructure are managed by the government which charges the operators a fee. There are several stations along the route which are only used by Soup trains and others where Soup trains do not stop at all. Soup's trains are 25 years old, originally purchased cheaply from an operator whose licence was withdrawn by the government. Soup believes the low price it paid is a key competitive advantage enabling them to steadily increase their return on capital employed, the company's main performance measure, to a level well in excess of their rivals. The shareholders are pleased with the growth in passenger numbers over the last five years, which is the other performance measure Soup uses. Soup's ageing trains spend increasing time undergoing preventative maintenance, safety checks or repairs. A recent television documentary also showed apparently poor conditions on board, such as defective heating and washroom facilities and dirty, torn seating. Passengers complained in the program of difficulties finding a seat, the unreliability of accessing wireless internet services and even that the menu in the on-board cafe had not changed for five years. Soup's CEO responded that unreliable internet access arose from the rapid growth in passengers expecting to access the internet on trains. She said Soup had never received any formal complaints about the lack of choice in the on-board cafe, nor had she heard of a recent press report that Soup's trains were badly maintained, so causing harm to the environment. The CEO has asked you, as chief management accountant, for your advice. 'In view of the gowernment's warning, we must develop performance measures balancing the needs of passengers with the requirements of the shareholders', she has said. 'I don't want to know how to improve the actual performance of the business; that is the job of the operational managers, nor do I just want a list of suggested performance measures. Instead I need to know why these performance measures will help to improve the performance of Soup.' The following data applies to Soup: $$ \begin{array}{lrr} & \text { Region A } & \text { Region B } \\ \hline \text { Number of services per day } & & \\ \text { Peak times } & 4 & 4 \\ \text { Other times } & 6 & 8 \\ \text { Number of passengers per day } & & \\ \text { Peak times } & 2,500 & 1,400 \\ \text { Other times } & 2,450 & 1,850 \end{array} $$ Soup owns its fleet of diesel powered trains. Each train in Region A has seven coaches with 70 passenger seats available per coach. In the less busy Region B, each train has six coaches each with 70 seats. As a condition of the licence, Soup runs a set number of services at both busy and quieter times in both regions. Soup has two larger rivals, both operating electric trains, which cause less harm to the environment than diesel powered trains. They run on the same routes in both regions. The government regulates fares charged to passengers, which are the same per distance travelled for every operator in Required: (a) Advise the CEO on how the use of the balanced scorecard could improve the performance management system of Soup. (b) Using the performance data given, evaluate the comments of the Deeland government that Soups trains are overcrowded. (c) Assess the problems Soup may encounter in selecting and interpreting performance measures when applying the balanced scorecard to its performance management system.
Close icon
Play audio
Feedback
Powered by NumerAI
*

Labs

-

Want to see this concept in action?

NEW

Explore this concept interactively to see how it behaves as you change inputs.

View Labs

*

Key Concepts

-
Performance Management System
A performance management system is a systematic process that uses a set of defined metrics or indicators to assess how well an organization is achieving its strategic objectives. It involves setting clear goals, tracking progress, and using insights gained from various performance measures to drive decision-making and continuous improvement across the organization.
Balanced Scorecard
The balanced scorecard is a strategic performance management tool that incorporates a mix of financial and non-financial measures across multiple perspectives, such as financial, customer, internal processes, and learning and growth. This multi-dimensional approach helps organizations align operations with strategy and monitor overall performance, ensuring that improvements in one area do not compromise performance in another.
Multi-Dimensional Performance Measures
Multi-dimensional performance measures address various aspects of business performance, extending beyond traditional financial metrics to include factors such as customer satisfaction, operational efficiency, and employee development. This holistic view supports balanced decision-making by ensuring that improvements in one area do not lead to declines in another, and it helps in identifying areas for improvement that might not be evident through financial data alone.
Leading and Lagging Indicators
Leading indicators are predictive measures that provide early signals about future performance, allowing proactive adjustments, while lagging indicators show the outcomes of past actions and provide a historical view of performance. Utilizing both types within a performance management framework ensures that organizations can anticipate future challenges and opportunities as well as assess the results of their strategic initiatives.
Indicator Selection and Interpretation Challenges
The process of choosing and interpreting performance measures involves several challenges, including determining which indicators best reflect the strategic priorities, avoiding an overemphasis on easily quantifiable measures at the expense of qualitative ones, and mitigating potential unintended consequences. Ensuring accurate and meaningful interpretation of these indicators is crucial, as misinterpretation can lead to misaligned strategies and decisions that might adversely affect other important aspects of performance.

*

Recommended Videos

-
discussion-case-united-airlinesnavigating-a-social-media-storm-in-2017-a-united-airlines-gate-agent-barred-two-girls-from-boarding-a-flight-because-the-teenagers-were-wearing-leggings-passen-38407

Discussion Case: United Airlines—Navigating a Social Media Storm In 2017, a United Airlines gate agent barred two girls from boarding a flight because the teenagers were wearing leggings. Passengers boarding the flight saw the commotion and began tweeting about the incident. Social media exploded, with users calling the incident "horrendous," "outrageous," and "nonsense." Many questioned why United considered this clothing inappropriate since many women passengers wear leggings, yoga, and athletic apparel for comfort while traveling. United responded to the criticisms by quoting their policy: "United shall have the right to refuse passengers who are not properly clothed via our Contract of Carriage." The company statement continued, "This is left to the discretion of the agents." Moreover, the two girls were traveling using a United employee pass and, according to the airline spokesperson, "we're not in compliance with our dress code policy for company benefit travel." It was a common industry practice to expect persons using the employee benefit privilege to dress more nicely than paying passengers. United promised to review their dress code policy but indicated that they would likely remain in agreement with the industry practice regarding a dress code for passengers using company benefit travel. A month later, United customers posted videos across multiple media outlets showing airport police dragging a passenger, Dr. David Dao, off a United Airlines flight. Dao appeared to have a bloodied face. The airline defended its actions, stating that it was customary practice to remove paying passengers on full flights so that off-duty crew members, needed at the flight's destination, could have a seat. United reported that passengers were asked if they would voluntarily give up their seats for compensation, and three passengers agreed. But four seats were needed, so the airline moved to its next action in their protocol—asking passengers to leave the plane. Dao reportedly was asked, and when he refused, the airline instructed airport security to remove him. Munoz immediately issued an apology, saying that it was unfortunate that sometimes "we have to re-accommodate customers." One woman reacted to this statement by posting on Twitter, "Nice to know that re-accommodate on United now means 'drag you violently out of your seat.'" Some Chinese social media users accused the United of racism, believing that Dao was targeted since he appeared Asian. The incident also drew the attention of Congressional leaders. Four members of the Senate commerce committee said in a letter to United Airlines, "The last thing a paying airline passenger should expect is a physical altercation with law enforcement personnel after boarding, especially one that could likely have been avoided." This incident occurred at a time when passengers were increasingly unhappy with higher airfares, as well as airlines' practice of adding extra fees for baggage, seat reservations, and other services that once were included with the basic plane ticket. A few hours after Munoz's initial apology, the company seemed to go on the offensive when it circulated a letter in which Munoz appeared to blame Dao, saying he defied the officers. Finally, a few days later, the airline changed its position once again, when Munoz stated that "United would take full responsibility for the situation." He also pledged that the company would conduct a full review of its policies in re-accommodating paid passengers to give off-duty crew members their seats and its interaction with law enforcement agencies within a few weeks. "We are going to fix what's broken so this never happens again," he said. The company subsequently issued a report stating that the incident involving Dao "was a failure of epic proportions that's grown to this breach of public trust. We get that. We let our policies and procedures get in the way of doing the right thing." A few weeks later United announced that it had reached "an amicable" settlement with Dao, although the specific terms were not disclosed. The company also reported that many of its policies related to this case were revised in the hope these actions will prevent a repeat of the public relations disaster that has engulfed the company after Dao was forcibly removed from a plane. Morning Consult, a brand-tracking company, reported that shortly after Dao was dragged off the airline, United's favorability rating dropped 47 points (on a scale from negative 100 to positive 100). This rating slowly rebounded in the days after the incident, but still lagged behind rivals American, Delta, and Southwest. As the airline attempted to win back the public's trust and rebound from a major drop in the company's favorability rating, another tragic story hit social media: the news of a dog dying after being placed in an overhead cargo bin without water during a three-hour flight. One passenger said, "I heard the dog barking a little and we didn't know it was barking a cry for help." According to another passenger, the flight attendant who placed the bag in the bin did not know there was a dog inside the bag. Morning Consult reported that United's favorability rating dropped 28 points when this incident became public. United Airlines tried to reassure the public of its care and compassion. "This was a tragic accident that should have never occurred, as pets should never be placed in the overhead bin," United said in a statement. "We assume full responsibility for this tragedy and express our deepest condolences to the family and are committed to supporting them. We are thoroughly investigating what occurred to prevent this from ever happening again." Discussion Questions Did these incidents constitute a crisis, as defined in the chapter?

Need help? Use Ace
Ace is your personal tutor. It breaks down any question with clear steps so you can learn.
Start Using Ace
Ace is your personal tutor for learning
Step-by-step explanations
Instant summaries
Summarize YouTube videos
Understand textbook images or PDFs
Study tools like quizzes and flashcards
Listen to your notes as a podcast
Continue solving this problem
Create a free account to:
  • View full step-by-step solution
  • Ask follow-up questions with Ace AI
  • Save progress and study later
Continue Free
Join the community

18,000,000+

Students on Numerade


Trusted by students at 8,000+ universities

Numerade

Get step-by-step video solution
from top educators

Continue with Clever
or



By creating an account, you agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
Already have an account? Log In

A free answer
just for you

Watch the video solution with this free unlock.

Numerade

Log in to watch this video
...and 100,000,000 more!


EMAIL

PASSWORD

OR
Continue with Clever