00:01
Here we're being asked to evaluate whether or not communities are either highly predictable or at least predictable or whether they are the opposite of this, highly unpredictable.
00:19
So, all right, highly predictable versus highly unpredictable.
00:40
All right.
00:41
And before i forget, let me just note that the answer, although it gets complicated, is highly unpredictable.
00:48
So highly unpredictable is more accurate here.
00:52
And then this question is broken down into two pieces, a and then a b.
00:57
And what we're asked in a is whether or not, in a highly predictable, if species were highly predictable, what their distributions would be like.
01:07
So imagine that we have a mountain side.
01:10
Okay, that's going to be my mountain.
01:12
I will write mountain here.
01:15
And imagine that we census the species of whatever, plants, animals, anything you want, going up the side of the mountain.
01:23
If species are highly predictable, then we'd expect species that live in communities to have similar distributions.
01:30
So each one of these lines represents the distribution of a species along the mountain.
01:35
So if we hiked up the mountain starting here and walked up to here, we'd say, oh, look, these three species all have similar distributions.
01:43
They start the same place in lower elevation, and they go up to this place at a middle elevation.
01:48
And we would see that would be true with other communities along the side of the mountain as well.
01:54
So if you had a highly predictable distribution of species, you'd have clusters of species that had similar ranges or distributions along the mountain.
02:05
If species are highly unpredictable, then those lines would not match up.
02:11
Each species would be, to use the vernacular, doing its own thing...