Question

Cal-Cut had dealt with Idaho Pipe for years. Idaho Pipe requested 30,000 feet of steel pipe from CalCut. Cal-Cut sent written confirmation. Idaho Pipe accepted the offer by return mail, changed the delivery date from October 15 to December 15, and sent $$\$ 20,000$$ in partial payment. Cal-Cut confirmed the order and did not change the October 15 delivery date, but wrote, "We will work it out," on the contract. Cal-Cut delivered 12,937 feet of pipe before October 5, which Idaho Pipe accepted. Then Cal-Cut refused to deliver any more pipe. The sale had become unprofitable, as the price of pipe had risen quickly. Was this deal enforced? Could Idaho Pipe recover damages? [Southern Idaho Pipe and Steel v. Cal-Cut Pipe and Supply, 567 P.2d 1246, Sup. Ct. Id. (1977)]

   Cal-Cut had dealt with Idaho Pipe for years. Idaho Pipe requested 30,000 feet of steel pipe from CalCut. Cal-Cut sent written confirmation. Idaho Pipe accepted the offer by return mail, changed the delivery date from October 15 to December 15, and sent $$\$ 20,000$$ in partial payment. Cal-Cut confirmed the order and did not change the October 15
delivery date, but wrote, "We will work it out," on the contract. Cal-Cut delivered 12,937 feet of pipe before October 5, which Idaho Pipe accepted. Then Cal-Cut refused to deliver any more pipe. The sale had become unprofitable, as the price of pipe had risen quickly. Was this deal enforced? Could Idaho Pipe recover damages? [Southern Idaho Pipe and Steel v. Cal-Cut Pipe and Supply, 567 P.2d 1246, Sup. Ct. Id. (1977)]
Show more…
The Legal Environment of Business
The Legal Environment of Business
Roger E. Meiners, Al… 14th Edition
Chapter 11, Problem 1 ↓

Instant Answer

verified

Step 1

The issue at hand is whether the contract between Cal-Cut and Idaho Pipe was enforceable and if Idaho Pipe could recover damages due to Cal-Cut's refusal to deliver the full 30,000 feet of steel pipe as initially agreed upon, after the price of pipe had risen.  Show more…

Show all steps

lock
AceChat toggle button
Close icon
Ace pointing down

Please give Ace some feedback

Your feedback will help us improve your experience

Thumb up icon Thumb down icon
Thanks for your feedback!
Profile picture
Cal-Cut had dealt with Idaho Pipe for years. Idaho Pipe requested 30,000 feet of steel pipe from CalCut. Cal-Cut sent written confirmation. Idaho Pipe accepted the offer by return mail, changed the delivery date from October 15 to December 15, and sent $$\$ 20,000$$ in partial payment. Cal-Cut confirmed the order and did not change the October 15 delivery date, but wrote, "We will work it out," on the contract. Cal-Cut delivered 12,937 feet of pipe before October 5, which Idaho Pipe accepted. Then Cal-Cut refused to deliver any more pipe. The sale had become unprofitable, as the price of pipe had risen quickly. Was this deal enforced? Could Idaho Pipe recover damages? [Southern Idaho Pipe and Steel v. Cal-Cut Pipe and Supply, 567 P.2d 1246, Sup. Ct. Id. (1977)]
Close icon
Play audio
Feedback
Powered by NumerAI
*

Labs

-

Want to see this concept in action?

NEW

Explore this concept interactively to see how it behaves as you change inputs.

View Labs

*

Key Concepts

-
Remedies and Damages
This concept refers to the legal options available to an aggrieved party when a contract is breached. Remedies typically include damages designed to cover the losses incurred as a result of nonperformance. The assessment of damages depends on factors like the extent of the breach and the measurable impact on the injured party.
Offer and Acceptance
This concept explains the fundamental process of forming a contract where one party makes an offer and the other accepts it. Key details include ensuring that the acceptance mirrors the offer exactly, creating mutual assent and a binding agreement. Any deviation from the offer’s terms may lead to a counteroffer rather than a valid acceptance.
Mirror Image Rule and Counteroffer
The mirror image rule requires that an acceptance must match the offer exactly without modifications. When the terms are altered—even a minor one—the acceptance is typically treated as a counteroffer rather than an unconditional agreement. This principle is crucial in determining whether a contract has been properly formed.
Modification of Contract Terms
Modifying contract terms involves changing the agreed-upon conditions of the offer. Any adjustments to essential terms, such as delivery dates or payment amounts, need to be explicitly agreed upon by both parties. Without clear mutual assent to these modifications, the original contractual obligations may continue to apply.
Partial Performance
Partial performance occurs when one party begins to fulfill their contractual obligations while disputes or ambiguities remain. It is significant because, in some circumstances, partial performance may validate the existence of a contract or at least give rise to claims of breach or damages if the full contract is not honored.
Breach of Contract
A breach of contract happens when one party fails to perform their duties as stipulated in the contract. Establishing a breach involves examining whether the agreed terms were clearly set and accepted, and if one party’s failure to perform has caused harm to the other, thereby possibly justifying legal remedies.
Course of Dealing
Course of dealing refers to the established pattern of previous conduct between parties in past transactions. This history can influence the interpretation of contractual terms by providing context and expectations about how parties manage their agreements. It is particularly useful in resolving ambiguities in contract formation and performance.

*

Recommended Videos

-
a-steel-pipe-150-mm-external-diameter-conveys-steam-at-a-temperature-of-260-c-and-it-is-covered-by-two-layers-of-lagging-each-50-mm-thick-the-thermal-conductivity-of-the-inside-layer-of-the-31422

A steel pipe with a 150 mm external diameter conveys steam at a temperature of 260 °C and is covered by two layers of lagging, each 50 mm thick. The thermal conductivity of the inside layer of the lagging is 0.086 W/m K, and that of the outside layer is 0.055 W/m K. The outside surface temperature of the steel pipe can be taken as the same as the temperature of the steam. The temperature of the outside layer of lagging is 27 °C. Consider that the steel pipe does not have the lagging. Then determine the rate of heat loss for this case. Based on this calculation and the research that you can make, discuss the heat losses through the lagged and unlagged pipes.

Need help? Use Ace
Ace is your personal tutor. It breaks down any question with clear steps so you can learn.
Start Using Ace
Ace is your personal tutor for learning
Step-by-step explanations
Instant summaries
Summarize YouTube videos
Understand textbook images or PDFs
Study tools like quizzes and flashcards
Listen to your notes as a podcast
Continue solving this problem
Create a free account to:
  • View full step-by-step solution
  • Ask follow-up questions with Ace AI
  • Save progress and study later
Continue Free
Numerade

Get step-by-step video solution
from top educators

Continue with Clever
or



By creating an account, you agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
Already have an account? Log In

A free answer
just for you

Watch the video solution with this free unlock.

Numerade

Log in to watch this video
...and 100,000,000 more!


EMAIL

PASSWORD

OR
Continue with Clever