Cayley Numbers (A. CAYLEY, 1845)
Let
$$
\mathcal{C}:=\mathcal{H} \times \mathcal{H}
$$
Consider the following composition law:
$$
\begin{gathered}
\mathcal{C} \times \mathcal{C} \longrightarrow \mathcal{C} \\
\left(\left(H_{1}, H_{2}\right),\left(K_{1}, K_{2}\right)\right) \mapsto\left(H_{1} K_{1}-\bar{K}_{2}^{\prime} H_{2}, H_{2} \bar{K}_{1}^{\prime}+K_{2} H_{1}\right)
\end{gathered}
$$
Here $\bar{H}^{\prime}$ denotes the conjugate transposed matrix of $H \in \mathcal{H} \subset M(2 \times 2 ; \mathbb{C})$ Show that this defines on an $\mathbb{R}$-bilinear map, which has no zero divisors, i.e. the "product" of two elements in $\mathcal{C}$ is zero, iff one of the two factors vanishes. This "CAYLEY multiplication" is, in general, neither commutative nor associative.
A deep theorem (M. A. KERVAIRE (1958), J. MILNOR (1958), J. BOTT (1958)) says that on an $n$-dimensional $(n<\infty)$ real vector space $V$ a bilinear form free of zero divisors can only exist when $n=1,2,4$ or $8 .$ Examples of such structures are the "real numbers", the "complex numbers", the "HAMILTON quaternions" and the "CAYLEY numbers". Compare with the article of F. Hirzebruch, [Hi].