Question

Consider a language such as Ada or Modula-2, in which a module $M$ can be divided into a specification (header) file and an implementation (body) file for the purpose of separate compilation (Section 10.2.1). Should $M$ 's specification itself be separately compiled, or should the compiler simply read it in the process of compiling M's body and the bodies of other modules that use abstractions defined in $M$ ? If the specification is compiled, what should the output consist of?

   Consider a language such as Ada or Modula-2, in which a module $M$ can be divided into a specification (header) file and an implementation (body) file for the purpose of separate compilation (Section 10.2.1). Should $M$ 's specification itself be separately compiled, or should the compiler simply read it in the process of compiling M's body and the bodies of other modules that use abstractions defined in $M$ ? If the specification is compiled, what should the output consist of?
 
Show more…
Programming Language Pragmatics
Programming Language Pragmatics
Michael L. Scott 1st Edition
Chapter 9, Problem 3 ↓

Instant Answer

verified

Step 1

In languages like Ada or Modula-2, the specification file defines the interface of the module, including the types, constants, variables, and subprograms that are available for use by other modules. It acts as a contract between the module and its users.  Show more…

Show all steps

lock
AceChat toggle button
Close icon
Ace pointing down

Please give Ace some feedback

Your feedback will help us improve your experience

Thumb up icon Thumb down icon
Thanks for your feedback!
Profile picture
Consider a language such as Ada or Modula-2, in which a module $M$ can be divided into a specification (header) file and an implementation (body) file for the purpose of separate compilation (Section 10.2.1). Should $M$ 's specification itself be separately compiled, or should the compiler simply read it in the process of compiling M's body and the bodies of other modules that use abstractions defined in $M$ ? If the specification is compiled, what should the output consist of?
Close icon
Play audio
Feedback
Powered by NumerAI
*

Labs

-

Want to see this concept in action?

NEW

Explore this concept interactively to see how it behaves as you change inputs.

View Labs

*

Key Concepts

-
Module Implementation
This refers to the body or the concrete code that implements the functionality declared in the module specification. It contains the executable statements and internal logic, and is typically compiled separately from the specification. The separation helps in maintaining abstraction and allows independent compilation of the implementation.
Separate Compilation
This is the process of compiling different parts of a program independently rather than as a single monolithic entity. It allows developers to compile modules separately, manage dependencies efficiently, and improve incremental compilation by only recompiling parts of the program that have changed.
Module Specification
The module specification (or interface) defines the public-facing elements of a module, such as types, procedures, and variables, without exposing the underlying implementation details. It provides the contract that other parts of the program rely on, ensuring that the module can be used correctly without needing to know its internal workings.
Compilation of Specifications
The decision on whether to compile the module specification independently or to read it during the compilation of module bodies revolves around efficiency and abstraction. Compiling the specification separately would generate a concise representation of the interface, such as a symbol table or signature, which can be used by the compiler when compiling dependent modules, ensuring consistency and reducing redundancy.
Interface Output and Abstraction Boundaries
If the specification is compiled, the expected output is an abstract description or summary of the public declarations—often in the form of a signature file or metadata—that supports type checking and linking without revealing the details of the implementation. This maintains the abstraction boundary between what is exposed to clients and the internal implementation details.

*

Recommended Videos

-
what-are-the-differences-between-compiler-vs-assembler-vs-interpreter-vs-linker-vs-transpiler-what-are-the-requirements-for-transferring-one-written-codes-to-different-types-of-code-to-run-94142

What are the differences between compiler vs. assembler vs. interpreter vs. linker vs. transpiler? What are the requirements for transferring one written code to different types of code to run?

Need help? Use Ace
Ace is your personal tutor. It breaks down any question with clear steps so you can learn.
Start Using Ace
Ace is your personal tutor for learning
Step-by-step explanations
Instant summaries
Summarize YouTube videos
Understand textbook images or PDFs
Study tools like quizzes and flashcards
Listen to your notes as a podcast
Continue solving this problem
Create a free account to:
  • View full step-by-step solution
  • Ask follow-up questions with Ace AI
  • Save progress and study later
Continue Free
Join the community

18,000,000+

Students on Numerade


Trusted by students at 8,000+ universities

Numerade

Get step-by-step video solution
from top educators

Continue with Clever
or



By creating an account, you agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
Already have an account? Log In

A free answer
just for you

Watch the video solution with this free unlock.

Numerade

Log in to watch this video
...and 100,000,000 more!


EMAIL

PASSWORD

OR
Continue with Clever