Question

Determine whether each of the following arguments provides adequate support, or any support, for its conclusion. Explain why. 1. I shouldn't get a speeding ticket for going fifty-six miles per hour, because my driving did not all of a sudden get more dangerous when I passed the speed limit of fifty-five. 2. No student should ever be allowed to ask a question during a lecture, because once one student asks a question, then another one wants to ask a question, and pretty soon the teacher doesn't have any time left to lecture. 3. Pornography shouldn't be illegal, because you can't draw a line between pornography and erotic art. 4. Marijuana should be legal, because it is no more dangerous than alcohol or nicotine. (continued) 5. Marijuana should be illegal, because people who try marijuana are likely to go on to try hashish, and then snorting cocaine, and then freebasing cocaine or shooting heroin. 6. The government should not put any new restrictions on free trade, because once they place some restrictions, they will place more and more until foreign trade is so limited that our own economy will suffer. 7. Governments should never bargain with any terrorist. Once they do, they will have to bargain with every other terrorist who comes along. 8. If assault weapons are banned, Congress will ban handguns next, and then rifles. Eventually, hunters will not be able to hunt, and law-abiding citizens will have no way to defend themselves against criminals.

   Determine whether each of the following arguments provides adequate support, or any support, for its conclusion. Explain why.
1. I shouldn't get a speeding ticket for going fifty-six miles per hour, because my driving did not all of a sudden get more dangerous when I passed the speed limit of fifty-five.
2. No student should ever be allowed to ask a question during a lecture, because once one student asks a question, then another one wants to ask a question, and pretty soon the teacher doesn't have any time left to lecture.
3. Pornography shouldn't be illegal, because you can't draw a line between pornography and erotic art.
4. Marijuana should be legal, because it is no more dangerous than alcohol or nicotine.
(continued)
5. Marijuana should be illegal, because people who try marijuana are likely to go on to try hashish, and then snorting cocaine, and then freebasing cocaine or shooting heroin.
6. The government should not put any new restrictions on free trade, because once they place some restrictions, they will place more and more until foreign trade is so limited that our own economy will suffer.
7. Governments should never bargain with any terrorist. Once they do, they will have to bargain with every other terrorist who comes along.
8. If assault weapons are banned, Congress will ban handguns next, and then rifles. Eventually, hunters will not be able to hunt, and law-abiding citizens will have no way to defend themselves against criminals.
Show more…
Cengage Advantage Books: Understanding Arguments: An Introduction to Informal Logic
Cengage Advantage Books: Understanding Arguments: An Introduction to Informal Logic
Walter… 9th Edition
Chapter 13, Problem 6 ↓

Instant Answer

verified

Step 1

" - This argument suggests that the danger of driving does not increase at the exact moment one exceeds the speed limit. However, it fails to address the importance of speed limits as a legal standard and does not provide adequate support for the conclusion that  Show more…

Show all steps

lock
AceChat toggle button
Close icon
Ace pointing down

Please give Ace some feedback

Your feedback will help us improve your experience

Thumb up icon Thumb down icon
Thanks for your feedback!
Profile picture
Determine whether each of the following arguments provides adequate support, or any support, for its conclusion. Explain why. 1. I shouldn't get a speeding ticket for going fifty-six miles per hour, because my driving did not all of a sudden get more dangerous when I passed the speed limit of fifty-five. 2. No student should ever be allowed to ask a question during a lecture, because once one student asks a question, then another one wants to ask a question, and pretty soon the teacher doesn't have any time left to lecture. 3. Pornography shouldn't be illegal, because you can't draw a line between pornography and erotic art. 4. Marijuana should be legal, because it is no more dangerous than alcohol or nicotine. (continued) 5. Marijuana should be illegal, because people who try marijuana are likely to go on to try hashish, and then snorting cocaine, and then freebasing cocaine or shooting heroin. 6. The government should not put any new restrictions on free trade, because once they place some restrictions, they will place more and more until foreign trade is so limited that our own economy will suffer. 7. Governments should never bargain with any terrorist. Once they do, they will have to bargain with every other terrorist who comes along. 8. If assault weapons are banned, Congress will ban handguns next, and then rifles. Eventually, hunters will not be able to hunt, and law-abiding citizens will have no way to defend themselves against criminals.
Close icon
Play audio
Feedback
Powered by NumerAI
*

Labs

-

Want to see this concept in action?

NEW

Explore this concept interactively to see how it behaves as you change inputs.

View Labs

*

Key Concepts

-
False Equivalence/Analogy
This occurs when an argument assumes that two things are essentially alike in relevant respects, when in fact the differences between them are significant enough to undermine the comparison. By equating dissimilar entities or situations, the argument fails to provide adequate justification for its conclusion, as the comparison does not hold under closer scrutiny.
Vagueness in Definitions
This concept involves the use of imprecise or fuzzily defined terms such that clear distinctions cannot be drawn between concepts. When definitions lack precise boundaries, it becomes difficult to differentiate between categories, which can lead to arguments that dismiss regulation or classification on the basis that there is no clear line to separate one concept from another.
Continuum Fallacy
Also known as the sorites paradox, this fallacy arises when one argues that because there is no sharp demarcation between two states or conditions, no real difference exists between them. This reasoning incorrectly assumes that small increments or differences are irrelevant, ignoring the fact that cumulative changes can indeed result in significant differences.
Slippery Slope Fallacy
This fallacy occurs when an argument claims that a certain action will inevitably lead to a chain of negative events without providing sufficient evidence for such an unavoidable progression. It is used to exaggerate the consequences of an action, by suggesting that a minor first step will lead to a series of events resulting in an extreme and undesirable outcome.

*

Recommended Videos

-
please-bracket-the-premises-and-underline-the-conclusions-in-the-following-arguments-2-while-performing-an-autopsy-on-a-dead-sea-turtle-dr-stacy-found-shrimp-in-the-turtles-throat-sea-turtle-72217

Please bracket the premises and underline the conclusions in the following arguments: 2. While performing an autopsy on a dead sea turtle, Dr. Stacy found shrimp in the turtle’s throat. Sea turtles can only catch shrimp if they are stuck in nets with the shrimp. Therefore, the dead sea turtle was probably caught in a net. 4. There are two ways of settling a dispute: by discussion and by physical force. Since the first way is appropriate for human beings and the second way appropriate for animals, we must resort to force only when we cannot settle matters by discussion. 6. The head of the spy ring is very dangerous. He is also exceptionally clever and a master of disguise. He has a dozen names and a hundred different appearances. But there is one thing he cannot disguise: he is missing the tip of his little finger. So, if you ever meet a man who is missing the top joint of his little finger, you should be very careful! 8. People are created equal and endowed with unalienable rights. Governments exist to protect those rights. When a government violates those rights, people have a right to rebel against that government and create a new one. The king of Great Britain has repeatedly violated the rights of the American colonists. Thus, the American colonists have a right to rebel against the king of Great Britain. 10. The only remaining question was why the man had been murdered. Was it a politically motivated crime or a private one? I thought right away that it must be a privately motivated crime. Political assassins move quickly and flee. But in this case, the murderer’s footprints are all over the room, showing that he had spent quite a while in this room.

identify-the-fallacy-in-each-of-the-following-statements-and-in-each-case-explain-why-the-statement-is-fallacious-i-dont-see-any-reason-to-wear-a-helmet-when-i-ride-a-bike-everyone-bikes-wit-38688

Identify the fallacy in each of the following statements and, in each case, explain why the statement is fallacious. I don't see any reason to wear a helmet when I ride a bike. Everyone bikes without a helmet. It's ridiculous to worry about protecting America's national parks against commercial development when innocent people are being killed by terrorists. There can be no doubt that the Great Depression was caused by Herbert Hoover. He became president in March 1929, and the stock market crashed just seven months later. Now that we allow the children of illegal immigrants to attend public schools, it's only a matter of time before those kids grow up and vote for candidates who will open our border completely. Eventually, our entire government will be run by illegal immigrants. Raising a child is just like having a pet—you need to feed it, play with it, and everything will be fine. I can't support Representative Frey's proposal for campaign finance reform. After all, he was kicked out of law school for cheating on an exam. One citizen polled said, "I'm not at all worried about the government collecting our personal data. What do I have to hide?" Another insisted, "I don't see what all the fuss is about. If you're worried about the NSA reading your email and seeing what websites you visit, then you're probably doing something wrong in the first place." We can see, then, that most U.S. citizens are not opposed to government data-collection programs. Our school must either increase tuition or cut back on library services for students.

Need help? Use Ace
Ace is your personal tutor. It breaks down any question with clear steps so you can learn.
Start Using Ace
Ace is your personal tutor for learning
Step-by-step explanations
Instant summaries
Summarize YouTube videos
Understand textbook images or PDFs
Study tools like quizzes and flashcards
Listen to your notes as a podcast
Continue solving this problem
Create a free account to:
  • View full step-by-step solution
  • Ask follow-up questions with Ace AI
  • Save progress and study later
Continue Free
Numerade

Get step-by-step video solution
from top educators

Continue with Clever
or



By creating an account, you agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
Already have an account? Log In

A free answer
just for you

Watch the video solution with this free unlock.

Numerade

Log in to watch this video
...and 100,000,000 more!


EMAIL

PASSWORD

OR
Continue with Clever