00:01
Question 83, the goal of this question is to show this relationship with a mean lifetime of a nucleus is given by 1 over lambda, one over the decay constant.
00:13
So this is what our end goal is.
00:15
So i'm going to start with defining what it means by mean time, mean lifetime of a particle.
00:22
So here i have a definition of the sum of the lifetimes of each particle, summing from 1 to total of n number of particles.
00:31
And that divided by the total sample and not my initial state of particles.
00:38
So i can rewrite my numerator as an integral now, the summation over a range, which is equivalent to an integral.
00:47
I'm just going to call that t for the time, dn, integrating from zero to infinity.
00:56
And since this is a decay process, there's a loss with every iteration.
01:02
So i'm going to, this whole integral would be negative because again, it's a decreasing rate.
01:06
So this is negative sign, negative sign comes from in front.
01:13
Yeah, i'm integrating from zero to infinity.
01:16
I'm basically extending the hint that i gave in the question where you integrate from zero to t, and then from t to t plus dt.
01:25
So continuing that logic, you can take the integral from zero to infinity.
01:28
So some of my bounds come from.
01:31
So now i have, i'm in this integral.
01:34
One thing i can note, i have time, so maybe it would be useful to display my, integral interest of d t and since i know the relationship for activity to be d n over d t is equivalent to negative lambda times the number of particles i can rearrange what i have here in the right hand side to replace my d n with a term for d t i can substitute that into my equation so i have a negative sign so my negative sign initially goes away again integrating from 0 to infinity.
02:14
My t remains, i have lambda and d t.
02:28
Additionally, i have an n over n not.
02:30
And if you look at our initial, or not initial, but our dk equation, i can rearrange this.
02:40
So i have n over and not like i have in my function there to be equivalent to negative e to the negative lambda t.
02:47
So i'll replace that ratio here.
02:53
So again, 0 to infinity.
02:57
Lambda is constant terms, i can pull that out.
03:00
So i have t, 10xpon, e negative lambda t, d t.
03:20
So i have this expression now, then i want to integrate from zero to infinity.
03:24
I think i can do this, but i, however, this is a well -known solution.
03:28
So i can just look -up, i can just access a look -up table to determine what this function would be.
03:35
So my lambda return remains out in front...