00:01
Okay, so to answer this question, we have to ask ourselves, when is a statistical hypothesis legitimate? okay, so a statistical hypothesis is legitimate if it is a statement about the population parameter.
00:22
And you might want to think of statistical hypothesis as illegitimate if it is a statement.
00:31
Making a statement about the sample statistic.
00:34
So if it's a population parameter, that's correct.
00:38
And if it's a sample statistic, that's wrong.
00:43
Okay, so looking at the problem that we have here, in part a, the hypothesis is about sigma being greater than 100.
00:54
So this is a legitimate statistical hypothesis.
01:01
Because sigma is a symbol which we use to denote the population standard deviation.
01:11
So this is a legitimate statistical hypothesis.
01:14
And the second hypothesis, which is in part b, is about phead being equal to 0 .45.
01:24
And this is not a legitimate statistical hypothesis, because it is a legitimate statistical hypothesis.
01:31
Because it is making a statement about p head, which we denote for the sample proportion.
01:39
So this is not a legitimate statistical hypothesis.
01:46
Okay, part c, we have s being less than or equal to 0 .2.
01:54
And this is not a legitimate statistical hypothesis because, it's making a statement about s which we use to denote the sample standard deviation.
02:09
All right.
02:09
So this is an incorrect hypothesis.
02:14
Okay, on part d, we have sigma 1 divided by sigma 2 being less than 1.
02:24
So sigma 1 is a symbol which we used to denote the population standard deviation for population 1 and sigma 2 is, you know, again, the symbol which we used to denote the population and standard deviation for population 2.
02:44
And so the ratio of this two is still a ratio calculated for the population parameters...