00:01
For this question, we have a random sample of nine students for the average number of hours they studied per week before attending a seminar in education and after attending the seminar.
00:12
And we're interested to know if there's evidence to suggest that the seminar increased the hours that students were studying.
00:20
And we're asked to test this at the alpha equals 0 .1 level.
00:28
So the first step is to identify the hypotheses.
00:31
So the no hypothesis is that the mean difference is zero, or that there was no change.
00:44
And the alternative hypothesis is that the mean difference in hours per week is less than zero.
00:54
That would indicate that the students after the seminar on average are studying more.
01:01
Now the next step is to calculate the critical value, so we have alpha equals 0 .10.
01:07
Also we have the sample size is 9 from the question.
01:12
So that gives us a degrees of freedom of eight.
01:17
So if we go to the t table and look this up, so we have eight degrees of freedom and an area of 0 .1 in one tail, because this is a left -tailed test.
01:38
And so our critical value is 1 .397.
01:48
And again, this is a left -tailed test, which means that it's negative 1 .397.
01:56
We know it's a left -tailed test because of our alternative hypothesis is less than zero.
02:04
And so our test value is of this form...