Question

Give an example of a 2 x 2 game (two players, two strategies each) where each player has a unique prudent strategy $x_i^*$; where $x^*=\left(x_1^*, x_2^*\right)$ is a Nash equilibrium and a Paretooptimal outcome; and $x^*$ is the only outcome such that $\alpha_i \leq u_i\left(x^*\right) i=1,2$; yet the game is not inessential since $\alpha_i<u_i\left(x^*\right)$ for $i=1,2$.

   Give an example of a 2 x 2 game (two players, two strategies each) where each player has a unique prudent strategy $x_i^*$; where $x^*=\left(x_1^*, x_2^*\right)$ is a Nash equilibrium and a Paretooptimal outcome; and $x^*$ is the only outcome such that $\alpha_i \leq u_i\left(x^*\right) i=1,2$; yet the game is not inessential since $\alpha_i<u_i\left(x^*\right)$ for $i=1,2$.
Show more…
Game Theory for the Social Sciences
Game Theory for the Social Sciences
Herve Moulin 1st Edition
Chapter 5, Problem 4 ↓

Instant Answer

verified

Step 1

A prudent strategy is a strategy that guarantees the highest possible payoff for a player, regardless of the other player's strategy. In a 2 x 2 game, each player has two strategies to choose from, so we need to find a game where one strategy for each player is  Show more…

Show all steps

lock
AceChat toggle button
Close icon
Ace pointing down

Please give Ace some feedback

Your feedback will help us improve your experience

Thumb up icon Thumb down icon
Thanks for your feedback!
Profile picture
Give an example of a 2 x 2 game (two players, two strategies each) where each player has a unique prudent strategy $x_i^*$; where $x^*=\left(x_1^*, x_2^*\right)$ is a Nash equilibrium and a Paretooptimal outcome; and $x^*$ is the only outcome such that $\alpha_i \leq u_i\left(x^*\right) i=1,2$; yet the game is not inessential since $\alpha_i<u_i\left(x^*\right)$ for $i=1,2$.
Close icon
Play audio
Feedback
Powered by NumerAI
*

Labs

-

Want to see this concept in action?

NEW

Explore this concept interactively to see how it behaves as you change inputs.

View Labs

*

Key Concepts

-
Game Essentiality
The concept of essentiality in games relates to whether the equilibrium outcome provides players with payoffs that exceed their minimal individual guarantees. A game is considered inessential if the equilibrium outcome merely meets the minimal criteria, while a non-inessential game is one in which the equilibrium payoffs are strictly greater than the players’ safeguarded levels. This distinction helps in understanding the strategic depth and the robustness of the equilibrium in ensuring players’ improved welfare.
Prudent Strategy
A prudent strategy is a concept referring to a strategy that a player chooses based on caution or security considerations, ensuring that a player's minimum acceptable payoff is achieved. When players have unique prudent strategies, it implies that there is a distinct strategy which secures each player's baseline payoff, and playing these strategies leads to equilibrium outcomes which are robust against risk.
Nash Equilibrium
A Nash equilibrium is a strategy profile in which no player can improve their payoff by unilaterally changing their strategy, given the strategy of the other player. It represents a point of mutual best response and is a central concept in game theory because it predicts the stable outcome of strategic interactions when players are rational and self?interested.
2x2 Normal Form Game
A 2x2 normal form game is one of the simplest representations in game theory, where two players each have two strategies. This framework is foundational for understanding strategic interactions in games, as it encapsulates the idea of simultaneous moves and payoff outcomes in a matrix format. Despite its simplicity, this model can illustrate a wide range of strategic phenomena and solution concepts.
Pareto Optimality
Pareto optimality is a concept of efficiency where an outcome is such that no player can be made better off without making at least one other player worse off. In the context of games, a Pareto optimal equilibrium indicates that the outcome is socially efficient, as any deviation from this point would harm at least one participant.

*

Recommended Videos

-
put-together-an-example-of-a-2x2-game-two-players-with-each-having-two-options-that-has-no-pure-strategy-nash-equilibria-hint-just-try-some-values-and-then-change-them-as-you-need-to-as-an-e-49463

Put together an example of a 2x2 game (two players with each having two options) that has NO pure-strategy Nash equilibria. (Hint: just try some values and then change them as you need to; as an example think about the Rock, Scissors paper which has no pure strategy NE).

Need help? Use Ace
Ace is your personal tutor. It breaks down any question with clear steps so you can learn.
Start Using Ace
Ace is your personal tutor for learning
Step-by-step explanations
Instant summaries
Summarize YouTube videos
Understand textbook images or PDFs
Study tools like quizzes and flashcards
Listen to your notes as a podcast
Continue solving this problem
Create a free account to:
  • View full step-by-step solution
  • Ask follow-up questions with Ace AI
  • Save progress and study later
Continue Free
Join the community

18,000,000+

Students on Numerade


Trusted by students at 8,000+ universities

Numerade

Get step-by-step video solution
from top educators

Continue with Clever
or



By creating an account, you agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
Already have an account? Log In

A free answer
just for you

Watch the video solution with this free unlock.

Numerade

Log in to watch this video
...and 100,000,000 more!


EMAIL

PASSWORD

OR
Continue with Clever