Question

In representation (5.4) and (5.8) of the $\gamma$-matrices, show that a possible choice of $C$ is $$ C \gamma^0=i \gamma^2=\left(\begin{array}{llll} & & & 1 \\ & -1 & & \end{array}\right) . $$ Try this operation out on a particular spinor, and show, for instance, that $$ \psi_C^{(1)}=i \gamma^2\left[u^{(1)}(\mathbf{p}) e^{-i p \cdot x}\right]^*=u^{(4)}(-\mathbf{p}) e^{i p \cdot x}=v^{(1)}(\mathbf{p}) e^{i p \cdot x} . $$ Further, show that in this representation $$ \begin{aligned} C^{-1} \gamma^\mu C & =\left(-\gamma^\mu\right)^T, \\ C & =-C^{-1}=-C^{\dagger}=-C^T, \\ \bar{\psi}_C & =-\psi^T C^{-1} . \end{aligned} $$ We have seen that the electron current is $$ j^\mu=-e \bar{\psi} \gamma^\mu \psi \text {. } $$ The current associated with the charge conjugate field is therefore $$ \begin{aligned} j_C^\mu & =-e \bar{\psi}_C \gamma^\mu \psi_C \\ & =+e \psi^T C^{-1} \gamma^\mu C \bar{\psi}^T \\ & =-e \psi^T\left(\gamma^\mu\right)^T \bar{\psi}^T \\ & =-(-) e \bar{\psi} \gamma^\mu \psi \end{aligned} $$ [see (5.39)]. The origin of the extra minus sign introduced in the last line is subtle but important. It is clearly necessary for a physically meaningful result, that is, if $j_C^\mu$ is to be the positron current. The minus sign is related to the connection between spin and statistics; in field theory, it occurs because of the antisymmetric nature of the fermion fields. In field theory, the charge conjugation operator $C$ changes a positive-energy electron into a positive-energy positron, and the formalism is completely $\mathrm{e}^{+} \leftrightarrow \mathrm{e}^{-}$symmetric. However, in a single-particle (electron) theory, positron states are not allowed; rather, $C$ changes a positive-energy electron state into a negative-energy electron state. As a result, we can show that we must add to our Feynman rules the requirement that we insert by hand an extra minus sign for every negative-energy electron in the final state of the process. The $C$ invariance of electromagnetic interactions then follows: $$ j_\mu^C\left(A^\mu\right)^C=\left(-j_\mu\right)\left(-A^\mu\right)=j_\mu A^\mu . $$

   In representation (5.4) and (5.8) of the $\gamma$-matrices, show that a possible choice of $C$ is
$$
C \gamma^0=i \gamma^2=\left(\begin{array}{llll}
& & & 1 \\
& -1 & &
\end{array}\right) .
$$

Try this operation out on a particular spinor, and show, for instance, that
$$
\psi_C^{(1)}=i \gamma^2\left[u^{(1)}(\mathbf{p}) e^{-i p \cdot x}\right]^*=u^{(4)}(-\mathbf{p}) e^{i p \cdot x}=v^{(1)}(\mathbf{p}) e^{i p \cdot x} .
$$

Further, show that in this representation
$$
\begin{aligned}
C^{-1} \gamma^\mu C & =\left(-\gamma^\mu\right)^T, \\
C & =-C^{-1}=-C^{\dagger}=-C^T, \\
\bar{\psi}_C & =-\psi^T C^{-1} .
\end{aligned}
$$

We have seen that the electron current is
$$
j^\mu=-e \bar{\psi} \gamma^\mu \psi \text {. }
$$

The current associated with the charge conjugate field is therefore
$$
\begin{aligned}
j_C^\mu & =-e \bar{\psi}_C \gamma^\mu \psi_C \\
& =+e \psi^T C^{-1} \gamma^\mu C \bar{\psi}^T \\
& =-e \psi^T\left(\gamma^\mu\right)^T \bar{\psi}^T \\
& =-(-) e \bar{\psi} \gamma^\mu \psi
\end{aligned}
$$
[see (5.39)]. The origin of the extra minus sign introduced in the last line is subtle but important. It is clearly necessary for a physically meaningful result, that is, if $j_C^\mu$ is to be the positron current. The minus sign is related to the connection between spin and statistics; in field theory, it occurs because of the antisymmetric nature of the fermion fields. In field theory, the charge conjugation operator $C$ changes a positive-energy electron into a positive-energy positron, and the formalism is completely $\mathrm{e}^{+} \leftrightarrow \mathrm{e}^{-}$symmetric. However, in a single-particle (electron) theory, positron states are not allowed; rather, $C$ changes a positive-energy electron state into a negative-energy electron state. As a result, we can show that we must add to our Feynman rules the requirement that we insert by hand an extra minus sign for every negative-energy electron in the final state of the process. The $C$ invariance of electromagnetic interactions then follows:
$$
j_\mu^C\left(A^\mu\right)^C=\left(-j_\mu\right)\left(-A^\mu\right)=j_\mu A^\mu .
$$
Show more…
Quarks and leptons: introductory course in modern particle physics
Quarks and leptons: introductory course in modern particle physics
Francis Halzen, Alan… 1st Edition
Chapter 5, Problem 6 ↓

Instant Answer

verified

Step 1

The matrix \( \gamma^2 \) in the standard representation is given by: \[ \gamma^2 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 & -i \\ 0 & 0 & -i & 0 \\ 0 & i & 0 & 0 \\ i & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix} \] - Multiplying by \( i \) gives: \[ i \gamma^2 =  Show more…

Show all steps

lock
AceChat toggle button
Close icon
Ace pointing down

Please give Ace some feedback

Your feedback will help us improve your experience

Thumb up icon Thumb down icon
Thanks for your feedback!
Profile picture
In representation (5.4) and (5.8) of the $\gamma$-matrices, show that a possible choice of $C$ is $$ C \gamma^0=i \gamma^2=\left(\begin{array}{llll} & & & 1 \\ & -1 & & \end{array}\right) . $$ Try this operation out on a particular spinor, and show, for instance, that $$ \psi_C^{(1)}=i \gamma^2\left[u^{(1)}(\mathbf{p}) e^{-i p \cdot x}\right]^*=u^{(4)}(-\mathbf{p}) e^{i p \cdot x}=v^{(1)}(\mathbf{p}) e^{i p \cdot x} . $$ Further, show that in this representation $$ \begin{aligned} C^{-1} \gamma^\mu C & =\left(-\gamma^\mu\right)^T, \\ C & =-C^{-1}=-C^{\dagger}=-C^T, \\ \bar{\psi}_C & =-\psi^T C^{-1} . \end{aligned} $$ We have seen that the electron current is $$ j^\mu=-e \bar{\psi} \gamma^\mu \psi \text {. } $$ The current associated with the charge conjugate field is therefore $$ \begin{aligned} j_C^\mu & =-e \bar{\psi}_C \gamma^\mu \psi_C \\ & =+e \psi^T C^{-1} \gamma^\mu C \bar{\psi}^T \\ & =-e \psi^T\left(\gamma^\mu\right)^T \bar{\psi}^T \\ & =-(-) e \bar{\psi} \gamma^\mu \psi \end{aligned} $$ [see (5.39)]. The origin of the extra minus sign introduced in the last line is subtle but important. It is clearly necessary for a physically meaningful result, that is, if $j_C^\mu$ is to be the positron current. The minus sign is related to the connection between spin and statistics; in field theory, it occurs because of the antisymmetric nature of the fermion fields. In field theory, the charge conjugation operator $C$ changes a positive-energy electron into a positive-energy positron, and the formalism is completely $\mathrm{e}^{+} \leftrightarrow \mathrm{e}^{-}$symmetric. However, in a single-particle (electron) theory, positron states are not allowed; rather, $C$ changes a positive-energy electron state into a negative-energy electron state. As a result, we can show that we must add to our Feynman rules the requirement that we insert by hand an extra minus sign for every negative-energy electron in the final state of the process. The $C$ invariance of electromagnetic interactions then follows: $$ j_\mu^C\left(A^\mu\right)^C=\left(-j_\mu\right)\left(-A^\mu\right)=j_\mu A^\mu . $$
Close icon
Play audio
Feedback
Powered by NumerAI
Need help? Use Ace
Ace is your personal tutor. It breaks down any question with clear steps so you can learn.
Start Using Ace
Ace is your personal tutor for learning
Step-by-step explanations
Instant summaries
Summarize YouTube videos
Understand textbook images or PDFs
Study tools like quizzes and flashcards
Listen to your notes as a podcast
Continue solving this problem
Create a free account to:
  • View full step-by-step solution
  • Ask follow-up questions with Ace AI
  • Save progress and study later
Continue Free
Numerade

Get step-by-step video solution
from top educators

Continue with Clever
or



By creating an account, you agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
Already have an account? Log In

A free answer
just for you

Watch the video solution with this free unlock.

Numerade

Log in to watch this video
...and 100,000,000 more!


EMAIL

PASSWORD

OR
Continue with Clever