Question

In the definition of subharmonic, the continuity assumption can be replaced by upper semi-continuity. Let $\varphi_z$ be as in Exercise 7.13. Suppose $v$ is upper semi-continuous on a region $\Omega$ and suppose $v$ satisfies the mean-value inequality on sufficiently small disks contained in $\Omega$. Define $$ v_\delta(z)=\int_{\mathbb{C}} v(w) \varphi_s(z-w) d A(w), $$ for $z \in \Omega$ and $\delta<\operatorname{dist}(z, \partial \Omega)$. (a) Prove that $v_z$ is subharmonic and decreases to $v$ (eventually) on compact subsets of $\Omega$. (d) Use part (a) or check the proofs directly using the definition of upper semicontinuity to show that the results of this chapter remain valid for this weaker definition of subharmonic.

   In the definition of subharmonic, the continuity assumption can be replaced by upper semi-continuity. Let $\varphi_z$ be as in Exercise 7.13. Suppose $v$ is upper semi-continuous on a region $\Omega$ and suppose $v$ satisfies the mean-value inequality on sufficiently small disks contained in $\Omega$. Define
$$
v_\delta(z)=\int_{\mathbb{C}} v(w) \varphi_s(z-w) d A(w),
$$
for $z \in \Omega$ and $\delta<\operatorname{dist}(z, \partial \Omega)$.
(a) Prove that $v_z$ is subharmonic and decreases to $v$ (eventually) on compact subsets of $\Omega$.
(d) Use part (a) or check the proofs directly using the definition of upper semicontinuity to show that the results of this chapter remain valid for this weaker definition of subharmonic.
Show more…
Complex Analysis
Complex Analysis
Donald E. Marshall 1st Edition
Chapter 7, Problem 14 ↓

Instant Answer

verified

Step 1

- The function \( v_\delta(z) \) is defined as a convolution of \( v \) with a mollifier \(\varphi_s\), which is a smooth approximation of the identity.  Show more…

Show all steps

lock
AceChat toggle button
Close icon
Ace pointing down

Please give Ace some feedback

Your feedback will help us improve your experience

Thumb up icon Thumb down icon
Thanks for your feedback!
Profile picture
In the definition of subharmonic, the continuity assumption can be replaced by upper semi-continuity. Let $\varphi_z$ be as in Exercise 7.13. Suppose $v$ is upper semi-continuous on a region $\Omega$ and suppose $v$ satisfies the mean-value inequality on sufficiently small disks contained in $\Omega$. Define $$ v_\delta(z)=\int_{\mathbb{C}} v(w) \varphi_s(z-w) d A(w), $$ for $z \in \Omega$ and $\delta<\operatorname{dist}(z, \partial \Omega)$. (a) Prove that $v_z$ is subharmonic and decreases to $v$ (eventually) on compact subsets of $\Omega$. (d) Use part (a) or check the proofs directly using the definition of upper semicontinuity to show that the results of this chapter remain valid for this weaker definition of subharmonic.
Close icon
Play audio
Feedback
Powered by NumerAI
Need help? Use Ace
Ace is your personal tutor. It breaks down any question with clear steps so you can learn.
Start Using Ace
Ace is your personal tutor for learning
Step-by-step explanations
Instant summaries
Summarize YouTube videos
Understand textbook images or PDFs
Study tools like quizzes and flashcards
Listen to your notes as a podcast
Continue solving this problem
Create a free account to:
  • View full step-by-step solution
  • Ask follow-up questions with Ace AI
  • Save progress and study later
Continue Free
Numerade

Get step-by-step video solution
from top educators

Continue with Clever
or



By creating an account, you agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
Already have an account? Log In

A free answer
just for you

Watch the video solution with this free unlock.

Numerade

Log in to watch this video
...and 100,000,000 more!


EMAIL

PASSWORD

OR
Continue with Clever