Question

It is helpful to work through an alternative derivation of the parton model result, (9.13)-(9.15), in terms of the invariant variables of $(6.29)$ : $$ s \simeq 2 k \cdot p, \quad u \simeq-2 k^{\prime} \cdot p, \quad t \equiv-Q^2=-2 k \cdot k^{\prime}, $$ that is, the ep $\rightarrow$ eX rate is simply the incoherent sum over all the contributing partons. Show that the invariant variables for the parton subprocess are given by $$ \hat{s}=x s, \quad \hat{u}=x u, \quad \hat{t}=t . $$ Use these relations, together with the $\mu$ scattering amplitude of (6.30), to show that $$ \left(\frac{d \sigma}{d t d u}\right)_{\mathrm{eq}_i \rightarrow \mathrm{eq}_1}=x \frac{d \sigma}{d \hat{t} d \hat{u}}=x \frac{2 \pi \alpha^2 e_i^2}{t^2}\left(\frac{s^2+u^2}{s^2}\right) \delta(t+x(s+u)) . $$ Now, also express the left-hand side of (9.17) in terms of $s, t$, and $u$. It is simplest to use (8.31). Verify that $$ \left(\frac{d \sigma}{d t d u}\right)_{\mathrm{ep} \rightarrow \mathrm{eX}}=\frac{4 \pi \alpha^2}{t^2 s^2} \frac{1}{s+u}\left[(s+u)^2 x F_1-u s F_2\right], $$ where $F_1 \equiv M W_1$ and $F_2 \equiv \nu W_2$. Insert (9.18) and (9.19) into (9.17). Compare coefficients of $u s$ and $s^2+u^2$ and so obtain the master formula of the parton model:

   It is helpful to work through an alternative derivation of the parton model result, (9.13)-(9.15), in terms of the invariant variables of $(6.29)$ :
$$
s \simeq 2 k \cdot p, \quad u \simeq-2 k^{\prime} \cdot p, \quad t \equiv-Q^2=-2 k \cdot k^{\prime},
$$
that is, the ep $\rightarrow$ eX rate is simply the incoherent sum over all the contributing partons. Show that the invariant variables for the parton subprocess are given by
$$
\hat{s}=x s, \quad \hat{u}=x u, \quad \hat{t}=t .
$$

Use these relations, together with the $\mu$ scattering amplitude of (6.30), to show that
$$
\left(\frac{d \sigma}{d t d u}\right)_{\mathrm{eq}_i \rightarrow \mathrm{eq}_1}=x \frac{d \sigma}{d \hat{t} d \hat{u}}=x \frac{2 \pi \alpha^2 e_i^2}{t^2}\left(\frac{s^2+u^2}{s^2}\right) \delta(t+x(s+u)) .
$$

Now, also express the left-hand side of (9.17) in terms of $s, t$, and $u$. It is simplest to use (8.31). Verify that
$$
\left(\frac{d \sigma}{d t d u}\right)_{\mathrm{ep} \rightarrow \mathrm{eX}}=\frac{4 \pi \alpha^2}{t^2 s^2} \frac{1}{s+u}\left[(s+u)^2 x F_1-u s F_2\right],
$$
where $F_1 \equiv M W_1$ and $F_2 \equiv \nu W_2$. Insert (9.18) and (9.19) into (9.17). Compare coefficients of $u s$ and $s^2+u^2$ and so obtain the master formula of the parton model:
Show more…
Quarks and leptons: introductory course in modern particle physics
Quarks and leptons: introductory course in modern particle physics
Francis Halzen, Alan… 1st Edition
Chapter 9, Problem 3 ↓

Instant Answer

verified

Step 1

For the process \( e p \rightarrow e X \), the Mandelstam variables are defined as: - \( s \simeq 2 k \cdot p \) (the square of the total energy in the center-of-mass frame), - \( u \simeq -2 k' \cdot p \) (the square of the four-momentum transfer  Show more…

Show all steps

lock
AceChat toggle button
Close icon
Ace pointing down

Please give Ace some feedback

Your feedback will help us improve your experience

Thumb up icon Thumb down icon
Thanks for your feedback!
Profile picture
It is helpful to work through an alternative derivation of the parton model result, (9.13)-(9.15), in terms of the invariant variables of $(6.29)$ : $$ s \simeq 2 k \cdot p, \quad u \simeq-2 k^{\prime} \cdot p, \quad t \equiv-Q^2=-2 k \cdot k^{\prime}, $$ that is, the ep $\rightarrow$ eX rate is simply the incoherent sum over all the contributing partons. Show that the invariant variables for the parton subprocess are given by $$ \hat{s}=x s, \quad \hat{u}=x u, \quad \hat{t}=t . $$ Use these relations, together with the $\mu$ scattering amplitude of (6.30), to show that $$ \left(\frac{d \sigma}{d t d u}\right)_{\mathrm{eq}_i \rightarrow \mathrm{eq}_1}=x \frac{d \sigma}{d \hat{t} d \hat{u}}=x \frac{2 \pi \alpha^2 e_i^2}{t^2}\left(\frac{s^2+u^2}{s^2}\right) \delta(t+x(s+u)) . $$ Now, also express the left-hand side of (9.17) in terms of $s, t$, and $u$. It is simplest to use (8.31). Verify that $$ \left(\frac{d \sigma}{d t d u}\right)_{\mathrm{ep} \rightarrow \mathrm{eX}}=\frac{4 \pi \alpha^2}{t^2 s^2} \frac{1}{s+u}\left[(s+u)^2 x F_1-u s F_2\right], $$ where $F_1 \equiv M W_1$ and $F_2 \equiv \nu W_2$. Insert (9.18) and (9.19) into (9.17). Compare coefficients of $u s$ and $s^2+u^2$ and so obtain the master formula of the parton model:
Close icon
Play audio
Feedback
Powered by NumerAI
*

Labs

-

Want to see this concept in action?

NEW

Explore this concept interactively to see how it behaves as you change inputs.

View Labs

*

Key Concepts

-
Parton Model
The parton model is a framework used to describe the scattering of leptons from hadrons by assuming that the hadron is made up of quasi-free, point-like constituents (partons). In this model, the scattering process is treated as an incoherent sum over individual hard-scattering events with these constituents, with each event characterized by the momentum fraction carried by a parton.
Invariant Variables
Invariant variables such as s, t, and u are scalar quantities constructed from the four-momenta of particles in the scattering process. They remain unchanged under Lorentz transformations, making them powerful tools for expressing the kinematics of high-energy collisions in a frame-independent way. Their definitions allow the formulation of relations between the observed and subprocess events by scaling, for instance, using the parton's momentum fraction.
Differential Cross Section
The differential cross section represents the probability for a scattering event to occur within a specific range of final state variables. In high-energy physics, differential cross sections are often expressed in terms of invariant variables and are related to the matrix elements of the scattering process. They encapsulate factors such as coupling constants, symmetry considerations, and phase space factors, and allow for comparisons between theoretical predictions and experimental measurements.
Structure Functions
Structure functions (usually denoted F1 and F2) quantify the distribution of quarks and gluons inside hadrons and embody the nonperturbative aspects of the hadronic structure. These functions appear in the description of deep inelastic scattering, where they relate the measured cross sections to the underlying partonic dynamics. They provide a connection between the experimental observables and the fundamental properties of the constituents of the hadron.
Delta Functions and Energy–Momentum Conservation
Delta functions are used in the formulation of scattering cross sections to enforce conservation of energy and momentum. In the context of scattering processes, they constrain the kinematic variables such that only physically allowed transitions contribute to the cross section. This ensures that the derived relations among invariant variables accurately reflect the conservation laws inherent in the underlying interaction.

*

Recommended Videos

-
problem-335-coherent-states-of-the-harmonic-oscillator-among-the-stationary-states-of-the-harmonic-o-08226

Problem 3.35 Coherent states of the harmonic oscillator. Among the stationary states of the harmonic oscillator $left(|n angle=psi_{n}(x) ight.$, Equation 2.67) only $n=0$ hits the uncertainty limit $left(sigma_{x} sigma_{p}=hbar / 2 ight) ;$ in general, $sigma_{x} sigma_{p}=(2 n+1) hbar / 2$, as you found in Problem 2.12. But certain linear combinations (known as coherent states) also minimize the uncertainty product. They are (as it turns out) eigenfunctions of the lowering operator: $$ a_{-}|alpha angle=alpha|alpha angle $$ (the eigenvalue $alpha$ can be any complex number). (a) Calculate $langle x angle,leftlangle x^{2} ight angle,langle p angle,leftlangle p^{2} ight angle$ in the state $|alpha angle .$ Hint: Use the technique in Example $2.5$, and remember that $a_{+}$ is the hermitian conjugate of $a_{-}$. Do not assume $alpha$ is real. (b) Find $sigma_{x}$ and $sigma_{p}$; show that $sigma_{x} sigma_{p}=h / 2$. (c) Like any other wave function, a coherent state can be expanded in terms of energy eigenstates: $$ |alpha angle=sum_{n=0}^{infty} c_{n}|n angle $$ Show that the expansion coefficients are $$ c_{n}=frac{alpha^{n}}{sqrt{n !}} c_{0} $$ (d) Determine $c_{0}$ by normalizing $|alpha angle .$ Answer: $exp left(-|alpha|^{2} / 2 ight)$. (e) Now put in the time dependence: $$ |n angle ightarrow e^{-i E_{n} i / Lambda}|n angle . $$ and show that $|alpha(t) angle$ remains an eigenstate of $a_{-1}$, but the eigenvalue evolves in time: $$ alpha(t)=e^{-i omega u} alpha $$ So a coherent state stays coherent, and continues to minimize the uncertainty product.

Need help? Use Ace
Ace is your personal tutor. It breaks down any question with clear steps so you can learn.
Start Using Ace
Ace is your personal tutor for learning
Step-by-step explanations
Instant summaries
Summarize YouTube videos
Understand textbook images or PDFs
Study tools like quizzes and flashcards
Listen to your notes as a podcast
Continue solving this problem
Create a free account to:
  • View full step-by-step solution
  • Ask follow-up questions with Ace AI
  • Save progress and study later
Continue Free
Numerade

Get step-by-step video solution
from top educators

Continue with Clever
or



By creating an account, you agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
Already have an account? Log In

A free answer
just for you

Watch the video solution with this free unlock.

Numerade

Log in to watch this video
...and 100,000,000 more!


EMAIL

PASSWORD

OR
Continue with Clever