Enroll in one of our FREE online STEM summer camps. Space is limited so join now!View Summer Courses

University of Southern California

Problem 1
Problem 2
Problem 3
Problem 4
Problem 5
Problem 6
Problem 7
Problem 8
Problem 9
Problem 10
Problem 11
Problem 12
Problem 13
Problem 14
Problem 15
Problem 16
Problem 17
Problem 18
Problem 19
Problem 20
Problem 21
Problem 22
Problem 23
Problem 24
Problem 25
Problem 26
Problem 27
Problem 28
Problem 29
Problem 30
Problem 31
Problem 32
Problem 33
Problem 34
Problem 35
Problem 36
Problem 37
Problem 38
Problem 39
Problem 40
Problem 41
Problem 42
Problem 43
Problem 44
Problem 45
Problem 46
Problem 47
Problem 48
Problem 49
Problem 50
Problem 51
Problem 52
Problem 53
Problem 54
Problem 55
Problem 56
Problem 57
Problem 58
Problem 59
Problem 60
Problem 61
Problem 62
Problem 63
Problem 64
Problem 65
Problem 66
Problem 67
Problem 68
Problem 69
Problem 70
Problem 71
Problem 72
Problem 73
Problem 74
Problem 75
Problem 76
Problem 77
Problem 78
Problem 79
Problem 80

Need more help? Fill out this quick form to get professional live tutoring.

Get live tutoring
Problem 76

Pattern Recognition Use a graphing utility to compare the graph of

$$f(x)=\frac{4}{\pi}\left(\sin \pi x+\frac{1}{3} \sin 3 \pi x\right)$$

with the given graph. Try to improve the approximation by

adding a term to $f(x) .$ Use a graphing utility to verify that

your new approximation is better than the original. Can you

find other terms to add to make the approximation even better?

What is the pattern? (Hint: Use sine terms.)

Answer

(ANSWER NOT AVAILABLE)

You must be logged in to like a video.

You must be logged in to bookmark a video.

## Discussion

## Video Transcript

all right. Question. Number 76 asks us to use a graphing utility to compare the graph of the following function. F of X equals four over pi times signed pi X plus 1/3 sign three pi X with the graph below, which is just the graph that is Ray here. Um, what we're going to want to do is find a way to improve our approximation formula, This one right here to make it match this graph and the question gives us a hint. And it says, Can you find any other terms that will improve this approximation? So we know that in order to make this function looks like this, we're going tto add some extra terms and there's a pattern. So we're not just going to add them randomly. We're gonna look at the function that they give us and see if there's any pattern we can deduce. Now, when I look right here between the 1st 2 terms were given, we see that the 1st 1 to sign Pi X and the next one is 1/3 sign three pi x. So there's a couple patterns we could think about, um, the first possible pattern could have been that for every new term you divide by three on the outside of her, tricking a metric function and multiply by three on the inside. And that's a reasonable pattern. So the next term in this in that instance, would be won over nine. Sign nine Pi X and so what you would do is you could go online to Dismas Graphing calculator or use your own graphing calculator, and you'd add that new term to this function inside these parentheses. And you do that. Justus. I didn't you'd see that. Well, that doesn't make the approximation any better. It actually makes it worse. So although that is a pattern, it's not the pattern we're looking for. So another pattern you might see is that all right, well, instead of multiplying by three, what if they're just dividing by a number that is two larger than the previous number and so and multiply our adding, adding by that same number on the inside of our children to mention function? So if that were the formula, or that we're the pattern, we see that the third term in this sequence would be 1/5 sign. Five high eggs and, um, I went along with that approximation, and I found or that pattern, and I found that it does a pretty good job of approximating. So over here this is our original function that were given to approximate. And when I add that 1/5 signed five pai ex term. You see that right here at the top form or function where there's all these peaks that a new peak is at and it gets closer to having a straight line. Now, when there's three terms, it looks like this. And then I went along and added two more terms and it gets better and better. And then, for just kicks in giggles, I added three extra terms, and you could see that the more terms we add following this pattern, the closer our approximation gets to becoming a straight line at positive one and negative one. And so, if you were to continue to adm. Or on more terms infinitely, this approximation would get closer and closer to approaching a straight line, and that's how you do it

## Recommended Questions