00:01
So in question 30, we have production managers on assembly line must monitor the output to be sure that the level of defective products remain small.
00:08
They periodically inspect a random sample of items produced.
00:11
If they find a significant increase in the proportion of items that must be rejected, they will halt the assembly process until the problem can be identified and repaired.
00:20
So we have two different hypotheses here for this.
00:25
The default hypothesis, the null hypothesis, is that the proportion, remains the same.
00:37
We don't really know what the proportion is, but we know that there's no change in the proportion.
00:41
The alternative is that the proportion has increased.
00:49
So in part a, what we're looking at here is what is a type 1 error? so a type 1 error is when you reject the null when the null is true.
01:07
So rejecting when the null is actually true.
01:10
So in this context, you would find convincing evidence, ce, you would find convincing evidence that the proportion has increased when it actually has remained the same.
01:36
So type 1 error is finding convincing evidence when the proportion really has remained the same.
01:43
So rejecting ho when you should not reject ho.
01:46
B, describe what a type 2 error is.
01:51
So a type 2 error is when you fail to reject the null when it should be rejected.
01:56
So writing that out, fail to reject the null when the null is false.
02:07
So it should be rejected...