Question

Prove that if $A$ and $B$ are sets such that $A \cup B \neq \emptyset$, then $A \neq \emptyset$ or $B \neq \emptyset$.

   Prove that if $A$ and $B$ are sets such that $A \cup B \neq \emptyset$, then $A \neq \emptyset$ or $B \neq \emptyset$.
 
Mathematical Proofs: A Transition to Advanced Mathematics
Mathematical Proofs: A Transition to Advanced Mathematics
Gary Chartrand,… 3rd Edition
Chapter 4, Problem 44 ↓

Instant Answer

verified

Step 1

We need to prove that if the union of two sets \(A\) and \(B\) is not empty, then at least one of the sets \(A\) or \(B\) is not empty.  Show more…

Show all steps

lock
AceChat toggle button
Close icon
Ace pointing down

Please give Ace some feedback

Your feedback will help us improve your experience

Thumb up icon Thumb down icon
Thanks for your feedback!
Profile picture
Prove that if $A$ and $B$ are sets such that $A \cup B \neq \emptyset$, then $A \neq \emptyset$ or $B \neq \emptyset$.
Close icon
Play audio
Feedback
Powered by NumerAI
*

Labs

-

Want to see this concept in action?

NEW

Explore this concept interactively to see how it behaves as you change inputs.

View Labs

*

Key Concepts

-
Union of Sets
The union A ? B is defined as the set of elements that are in A, or in B, or in both. This concept is fundamental in set theory and involves the idea that membership in the union comes from membership in at least one of the contributing sets.
Empty Set
The empty set is the unique set that contains no elements. Its important property in this context is that if both sets A and B are empty, then their union is empty, making it central to understanding conditions for non-emptiness.
Logical Disjunction
Logical disjunction, often expressed as 'or', means that if at least one of the conditions holds, the entire statement is true. This is directly related to the idea that the union of two sets is non-empty if at least one of them contains an element.
Proof by Contrapositive
Proof by contrapositive involves proving an implication by demonstrating that the negation of the conclusion implies the negation of the premise. In this case, showing that if both A and B are empty then A ? B is empty, which supports the original claim.

*

Recommended Videos

-
a-let-ab-be-sets-prove-that-aub-a-if-and-only-if-bea-assume-alt-bca-w-we-mut-show-aue-za-let-cb-then-b-ea-7-ta-35279

Let A, B be sets. Prove that A ∪ B = A if and only if B ⊆ A. Assume A ∪ B = A. We must show that B ⊆ A. Let x ∈ B. Then x ∈ A ∪ B. Since A ∪ B = A, we have x ∈ A. Therefore, B ⊆ A.

Need help? Use Ace
Ace is your personal tutor. It breaks down any question with clear steps so you can learn.
Start Using Ace
Ace is your personal tutor for learning
Step-by-step explanations
Instant summaries
Summarize YouTube videos
Understand textbook images or PDFs
Study tools like quizzes and flashcards
Listen to your notes as a podcast
Continue solving this problem
Create a free account to:
  • View full step-by-step solution
  • Ask follow-up questions with Ace AI
  • Save progress and study later
Continue Free
Join the community

18,000,000+

Students on Numerade


Trusted by students at 8,000+ universities

Numerade

Get step-by-step video solution
from top educators

Continue with Clever
or



By creating an account, you agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
Already have an account? Log In

A free answer
just for you

Watch the video solution with this free unlock.

Numerade

Log in to watch this video
...and 100,000,000 more!


EMAIL

PASSWORD

OR
Continue with Clever