Question

Prove that the $\alpha_i$ and $\beta$ are hermitian, traceless matrices of even dimensionality, with eigenvalues \pm 1 . The lowest dimensionality matrices satisfying all these requirements are $4 \times 4$. The choice of the four matrices $(\alpha, \beta)$ is not unique. The Dirac-Pauli representation is most frequently used: $$ \alpha=\left(\begin{array}{ll} 0 & \boldsymbol{\sigma} \\ \boldsymbol{\sigma} & 0 \end{array}\right), \quad \beta=\left(\begin{array}{rr} I & 0 \\ 0 & -I \end{array}\right) $$ where $I$ denotes the unit $2 \times 2$ matrix (which is frequently written as 1) and where $\boldsymbol{\sigma}$ are the Pauli matrices: $$ \sigma_1=\left(\begin{array}{ll} 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 \end{array}\right), \quad \sigma_2=\left(\begin{array}{rr} 0 & -i \\ i & 0 \end{array}\right), \quad \sigma_3=\left(\begin{array}{rr} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & -1 \end{array}\right) . $$ Another possible representation, the Weyl representation, is $$ \alpha=\left(\begin{array}{rr} -\sigma & 0 \\ 0 & \sigma \end{array}\right), \quad \beta=\left(\begin{array}{ll} 0 & I \\ I & 0 \end{array}\right) $$ Most of the results are independent of the choice of representation. Certainly, all the physics depends only on the properties listed in (5.3). In fact, not until we exhibit explicit solutions of the Dirac equation in Section 5.3 will we use a particular representation. Unless stated otherwise, we shall always choose the Dirac-Pauli representation, (5.4). A four-component column vector $\psi$ which satisfies the Dirac equation (5.1) is called a Dirac spinor. We might have anticipated two independent solutions (particles and antiparticles), but instead we have four! Maybe the surprise should not have been total. We know at least one other example where a field with more components appears when linearizing the equation. The covariant Maxwell equations $\square^2 A_\mu=0$ are second-order but can be written in a linear form $\partial_\mu F^{\mu \nu}=0$ by introducing the field strength $F_{\mu \nu}$, which has more components than $A_{\mu^*}$

   Prove that the $\alpha_i$ and $\beta$ are hermitian, traceless matrices of even dimensionality, with eigenvalues \pm 1 .

The lowest dimensionality matrices satisfying all these requirements are $4 \times 4$. The choice of the four matrices $(\alpha, \beta)$ is not unique. The Dirac-Pauli representation is most frequently used:
$$
\alpha=\left(\begin{array}{ll}
0 & \boldsymbol{\sigma} \\
\boldsymbol{\sigma} & 0
\end{array}\right), \quad \beta=\left(\begin{array}{rr}
I & 0 \\
0 & -I
\end{array}\right)
$$
where $I$ denotes the unit $2 \times 2$ matrix (which is frequently written as 1) and where $\boldsymbol{\sigma}$ are the Pauli matrices:
$$
\sigma_1=\left(\begin{array}{ll}
0 & 1 \\
1 & 0
\end{array}\right), \quad \sigma_2=\left(\begin{array}{rr}
0 & -i \\
i & 0
\end{array}\right), \quad \sigma_3=\left(\begin{array}{rr}
1 & 0 \\
0 & -1
\end{array}\right) .
$$

Another possible representation, the Weyl representation, is
$$
\alpha=\left(\begin{array}{rr}
-\sigma & 0 \\
0 & \sigma
\end{array}\right), \quad \beta=\left(\begin{array}{ll}
0 & I \\
I & 0
\end{array}\right)
$$

Most of the results are independent of the choice of representation. Certainly, all the physics depends only on the properties listed in (5.3). In fact, not until we exhibit explicit solutions of the Dirac equation in Section 5.3 will we use a particular representation. Unless stated otherwise, we shall always choose the Dirac-Pauli representation, (5.4).

A four-component column vector $\psi$ which satisfies the Dirac equation (5.1) is called a Dirac spinor. We might have anticipated two independent solutions (particles and antiparticles), but instead we have four!

Maybe the surprise should not have been total. We know at least one other example where a field with more components appears when linearizing the equation. The covariant Maxwell equations $\square^2 A_\mu=0$ are second-order but can be written in a linear form $\partial_\mu F^{\mu \nu}=0$ by introducing the field strength $F_{\mu \nu}$, which has more components than $A_{\mu^*}$
Show more…
Quarks and leptons: introductory course in modern particle physics
Quarks and leptons: introductory course in modern particle physics
Francis Halzen, Alan… 1st Edition
Chapter 5, Problem 1 ↓

Instant Answer

verified

Step 1

e., $A = A^\dagger$. A matrix is traceless if the sum of its diagonal elements (its trace) is zero. The eigenvalues of a Hermitian matrix are always real, and since we are looking for matrices with eigenvalues $\pm 1$, the matrices must be such that their squares  Show more…

Show all steps

lock
AceChat toggle button
Close icon
Ace pointing down

Please give Ace some feedback

Your feedback will help us improve your experience

Thumb up icon Thumb down icon
Thanks for your feedback!
Profile picture
Prove that the $\alpha_i$ and $\beta$ are hermitian, traceless matrices of even dimensionality, with eigenvalues \pm 1 . The lowest dimensionality matrices satisfying all these requirements are $4 \times 4$. The choice of the four matrices $(\alpha, \beta)$ is not unique. The Dirac-Pauli representation is most frequently used: $$ \alpha=\left(\begin{array}{ll} 0 & \boldsymbol{\sigma} \\ \boldsymbol{\sigma} & 0 \end{array}\right), \quad \beta=\left(\begin{array}{rr} I & 0 \\ 0 & -I \end{array}\right) $$ where $I$ denotes the unit $2 \times 2$ matrix (which is frequently written as 1) and where $\boldsymbol{\sigma}$ are the Pauli matrices: $$ \sigma_1=\left(\begin{array}{ll} 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 \end{array}\right), \quad \sigma_2=\left(\begin{array}{rr} 0 & -i \\ i & 0 \end{array}\right), \quad \sigma_3=\left(\begin{array}{rr} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & -1 \end{array}\right) . $$ Another possible representation, the Weyl representation, is $$ \alpha=\left(\begin{array}{rr} -\sigma & 0 \\ 0 & \sigma \end{array}\right), \quad \beta=\left(\begin{array}{ll} 0 & I \\ I & 0 \end{array}\right) $$ Most of the results are independent of the choice of representation. Certainly, all the physics depends only on the properties listed in (5.3). In fact, not until we exhibit explicit solutions of the Dirac equation in Section 5.3 will we use a particular representation. Unless stated otherwise, we shall always choose the Dirac-Pauli representation, (5.4). A four-component column vector $\psi$ which satisfies the Dirac equation (5.1) is called a Dirac spinor. We might have anticipated two independent solutions (particles and antiparticles), but instead we have four! Maybe the surprise should not have been total. We know at least one other example where a field with more components appears when linearizing the equation. The covariant Maxwell equations $\square^2 A_\mu=0$ are second-order but can be written in a linear form $\partial_\mu F^{\mu \nu}=0$ by introducing the field strength $F_{\mu \nu}$, which has more components than $A_{\mu^*}$
Close icon
Play audio
Feedback
Powered by NumerAI
Need help? Use Ace
Ace is your personal tutor. It breaks down any question with clear steps so you can learn.
Start Using Ace
Ace is your personal tutor for learning
Step-by-step explanations
Instant summaries
Summarize YouTube videos
Understand textbook images or PDFs
Study tools like quizzes and flashcards
Listen to your notes as a podcast
Continue solving this problem
Create a free account to:
  • View full step-by-step solution
  • Ask follow-up questions with Ace AI
  • Save progress and study later
Continue Free
Numerade

Get step-by-step video solution
from top educators

Continue with Clever
or



By creating an account, you agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
Already have an account? Log In

A free answer
just for you

Watch the video solution with this free unlock.

Numerade

Log in to watch this video
...and 100,000,000 more!


EMAIL

PASSWORD

OR
Continue with Clever