Problem

Prove that $ \displaystyle \lim_{x \to 0^+} \ln x…

02:13

Question

Answered step-by-step

Problem 42 Medium Difficulty

Prove, using Definition 6, that $ \displaystyle \lim_{x \to -3} \frac{1}{(x + 3)^4} = \infty $.

Video Answer

Solved by verified expert

Textbook Answer

Official textbook answer

Video by Daniel Jaimes

Numerade Educator

This textbook answer is only visible when subscribed! Please subscribe to view the answer

Related Courses

Calculus 1 / AB

Calculus: Early Transcendentals

Chapter 2

Limits and Derivatives

Section 4

The Precise Definition of a Limit

Discussion

You must be signed in to discuss.

Top Calculus 1 / AB Educators

Watch More Solved Questions in Chapter 2

Problem 1

Problem 2

Problem 3

Problem 4

Problem 5

Problem 6

Problem 7

Problem 8

Problem 9

Problem 10

Problem 11

Problem 12

Problem 13

Problem 14

Problem 15

Problem 16

Problem 17

Problem 18

Problem 19

Problem 20

Problem 21

Problem 22

Problem 23

Problem 24

Problem 25

Problem 26

Problem 27

Problem 28

Problem 29

Problem 30

Problem 31

Problem 32

Problem 33

Problem 34

Problem 35

Problem 36

Problem 37

Problem 38

Problem 39

Problem 40

Problem 41

Problem 42

Problem 43

Problem 44

Video Transcript

this's problem or forty two of the Stuart Calculus, either edition section two point four prove using definition six. That the limit is experts is negative. Three of the function one over the quantity X plus three to the fourth power. It's called an identity. So definition six states that for any m greater than zero there exists a delta grid. Isn't zero such that if the absolute value of the difference between X and me is Liston daughter, then the function is guaranteed to be great with them. So we just being with second inequality and see what relationship we confined between them and Delta. So our function this one over the quantity X plus three to the fourth and we want to guarantee that this greater than any value we choose for them. We re arrange this one over him created than the quantity express T to the fourth. And then we take ah, the forth route to put science And here the forth route cancel. And what we're left with is that the quantity extra story must be less Stan the must be listen one over the forth route of him. If we recall the conditional for Delta Is that expectancy or in this case, Xmas Negative three. Must be. This difference was fearless and Delta and And we re write it this way. You can see that Delta and this term here. Ah, having value equal to that is an appropriate choice that guarantees bad for any delta. Are you can find any delta for any given value? Mm. For example. Mmm is ten thousand. The four three ten thousand is ten. So choosing the delta equal to one over ten. Ah provide prevents the conditions needed to prove this limit. So for any value, them there exists a daughter, and therefore the positive values and the both correspond to these inequalities. And everything is consistent there forthis summit as expressing it. Three of dysfunction, unequal to infinity.

Get More Help with this Textbook

James Stewart

Calculus: Early Transcendentals

View More Answers From This Book

Find Another Textbook

Study Groups

Study with other students and unlock Numerade solutions for free.

Problem

Prove that $ \displaystyle \lim_{x \to 0^+} \ln x…

This textbook answer is only visible when subscribed! Please subscribe to view the answer

Related Courses

Calculus: Early Transcendentals

Related Topics

Discussion

Top Calculus 1 / AB Educators

Grace He

Heather Zimmers

Kayleah Tsai

Samuel Hannah

Calculus 1 / AB Courses

Recommended Videos

Watch More Solved Questions in Chapter 2

Video Transcript

James Stewart

Calculus: Early Transcendentals

Grace He

Heather Zimmers

Kayleah Tsai

Samuel Hannah

This textbook answer is only visible when subscribed! Please subscribe to view the answer

Calculus: Early Transcendentals

Grace He

Heather Zimmers

Kayleah Tsai

Samuel Hannah

James StewartCalculus: Early Transcendentals

Grace He

Heather Zimmers

Kayleah Tsai

Samuel Hannah

James Stewart

Calculus: Early Transcendentals