00:01
All right, so next example that we're going to take a look at is this anorexia example.
00:06
We see that there's quite a few before -after treatments.
00:11
So that's going to make for a lot of calculations.
00:14
We're going to be looking at the 5 % significance level of 17 anorexic young women.
00:21
So alpha is going to be 0 .05.
00:25
Our sample size is n equals 17, which means that our critical.
00:31
Value and is going to be at wc.
00:37
Let's make that a w.
00:39
There we go.
00:41
And we'll look over here at table five.
00:45
We have sample size of 17, significance level of 0 .05.
00:50
That's gonna be 112.
00:53
And let me just check that we were doing a one -tailed test.
01:01
Does family therapy appear to be effective in helping anorexic young women gain weight? so does it appear to be effective, which is going to mean more effective than not doing anything at all? so yeah, we'll do a one -tail test, right -tail test here.
01:23
So we're going to look for 112 right there.
01:29
And next thing we can do is just start taking those differences of before and after.
01:36
So first one, we're only going to calculate the, oh, well, are we going to go backwards or forwards? because they need to gain weight.
01:50
They need to gain weight to say that the treatment was effective, so we're only going to be looking at the negative values.
01:58
So we go from 83 .3 minus 94 .3.
02:03
That's a gain of 11 pounds.
02:07
And then 86 to 91 .5.
02:12
It's 5 .5, 82 .5, 82 .5 minus 91 .9 .9 .4.
02:30
86 .7 minus 100 .3.
02:36
Negative 13 .6.
02:38
So we're just going to take the positive values here.
02:44
Oh, 79 .6 is 76 .7.
02:47
So we'll skip that one.
02:48
And then we'll go to 87 .3 to 98 .0.
03:01
So that's gain at 10 .7.
03:06
And then 76 .9 to 76 .8...