Problem

Prove that the function $$ f(x) = x^101 + x^51 +…

00:36

Question

Answered step-by-step

Problem 76 Medium Difficulty

Show that $5$ is a critical number of the function
$$ g(x) = 2 + (x - 5)^3 $$
but $g$ does not have a local extreme value at $5$.

Video Answer

Solved by verified expert

Textbook Answer

Official textbook answer

Video by Yuki Hotta

Numerade Educator

This textbook answer is only visible when subscribed! Please subscribe to view the answer

Watch More Solved Questions in Chapter 4

Problem 1

Problem 2

Problem 3

Problem 4

Problem 5

Problem 6

Problem 7

Problem 8

Problem 9

Problem 10

Problem 11

Problem 12

Problem 13

Problem 14

Problem 15

Problem 16

Problem 17

Problem 18

Problem 19

Problem 20

Problem 21

Problem 22

Problem 23

Problem 24

Problem 25

Problem 26

Problem 27

Problem 28

Problem 29

Problem 30

Problem 31

Problem 32

Problem 33

Problem 34

Problem 35

Problem 36

Problem 37

Problem 38

Problem 39

Problem 40

Problem 41

Problem 42

Problem 43

Problem 44

Problem 45

Problem 46

Problem 47

Problem 48

Problem 49

Problem 50

Problem 51

Problem 52

Problem 53

Problem 54

Problem 55

Problem 56

Problem 57

Problem 58

Problem 59

Problem 60

Problem 61

Problem 62

Problem 63

Problem 64

Problem 65

Problem 66

Problem 67

Problem 68

Problem 69

Problem 70

Problem 71

Problem 72

Problem 73

Problem 74

Problem 75

Problem 76

Problem 77

Problem 78

Problem 79

Problem 80

Video Transcript

All right, let's go through this problem we have. Why is equal to two plus X minus five Cube in the question is asking Show that X equals to five gives you the derivative equals to zero. But when I plug in five, why will end up being two and five comments to is not going to be a maximum or minimum. So one of those things that I mentioned that those air called a saddle point. Okay, so let's figure out what why Prime is equal to first two disappears. So this will be three times X minus five quantity squared. The derivative of insight is one, so we don't need to care about that now. If this is equal to zero, it's very easy to calculate that X is equal to five. So that part, I'm sure you can follow so well, like Prime is equal to zero at X equals 25 So why is it that this is not going to be a maximum or minimum? Uh, the precise definition off how ah local maximum and minimum appears Is that the slow pass to be zero off course? Why prime is going to be zero. But the sign has to change at the point, so from negative to positive or positive to negative. So if you look at the graph off three times X minus five, squared at X equals to five. The graph looks roughly like this, and as you can see that the sign doesn't change here. It's positive values here in positive values there, even though why prime is equal to zero. So what happens in the graph off the original one? Let's show you, you can see that it increases over here, but it's still increases there, even though the slope it's momentarily equal to zero at X equals 25 So that's one of the things that could happen just because the derivative is equal to zero. That doesn't necessarily mean that you will have a local maximum or a minimum, and that's how you showed this problem.

Get More Help with this Textbook

James Stewart

Calculus: Early Transcendentals

View More Answers From This Book

Find Another Textbook

Study Groups

Study with other students and unlock Numerade solutions for free.

Problem

Prove that the function $$ f(x) = x^101 + x^51 +…

This textbook answer is only visible when subscribed! Please subscribe to view the answer

More Answers

Related Courses

Calculus: Early Transcendentals

Related Topics

Discussion

Top Calculus 2 / BC Educators

Heather Zimmers

Kayleah Tsai

Kristen Karbon

Joseph Lentino

Calculus 2 / BC Courses

Recommended Videos

Watch More Solved Questions in Chapter 4

Video Transcript

James Stewart

Calculus: Early Transcendentals

Heather Zimmers

Kayleah Tsai

Kristen Karbon

Joseph Lentino

This textbook answer is only visible when subscribed! Please subscribe to view the answer

Calculus: Early Transcendentals

Heather Zimmers

Kayleah Tsai

Kristen Karbon

Joseph Lentino

James StewartCalculus: Early Transcendentals

Heather Zimmers

Kayleah Tsai

Kristen Karbon

Joseph Lentino

James Stewart

Calculus: Early Transcendentals