Problem

(a) We must have $e^{x}-3>0 \Leftrightarrow e^{x}…

02:22

Question

Answered step-by-step

Problem 56 Hard Difficulty

Solve each inequality for x.

(a) $ 1< e^{3x - 1} < 2 $
(b) $ 1 - 2 \ln x < 3 $

Video Answer

Solved by verified expert

Textbook Answer

Official textbook answer

Video by Mary Wakumoto

Numerade Educator

This textbook answer is only visible when subscribed! Please subscribe to view the answer

Johns Hopkins University

Watch More Solved Questions in Chapter 1

Problem 1

Problem 2

Problem 3

Problem 4

Problem 5

Problem 6

Problem 7

Problem 8

Problem 9

Problem 10

Problem 11

Problem 12

Problem 13

Problem 14

Problem 15

Problem 16

Problem 17

Problem 18

Problem 19

Problem 20

Problem 21

Problem 22

Problem 23

Problem 24

Problem 25

Problem 26

Problem 27

Problem 28

Problem 29

Problem 30

Problem 31

Problem 32

Problem 33

Problem 34

Problem 35

Problem 36

Problem 37

Problem 38

Problem 39

Problem 40

Problem 41

Problem 42

Problem 43

Problem 44

Problem 45

Problem 46

Problem 47

Problem 48

Problem 49

Problem 50

Problem 51

Problem 52

Problem 53

Problem 54

Problem 55

Problem 56

Problem 57

Problem 58

Problem 59

Problem 60

Problem 61

Problem 62

Problem 63

Problem 64

Problem 65

Problem 66

Problem 67

Problem 68

Problem 69

Problem 70

Problem 71

Problem 72

Problem 73

Problem 74

Problem 75

Problem 76

Problem 77

Video Transcript

Alright, it's time to solve some inequalities with exponential and log functions. This looks like fun. Alright, so let's take a look at a um we want to get the X out of the exponents so we can do that by doing the inverse function to E which is Ln Ln of every term. So we'll get L out of one Less than Ln of E to the three X -1 less. An Ln of two. Ln of one by the way is zero. Um Alright, so we get zero lesson member Ln of E. These are composite inverse functions. They undo each other mathematically and out pops the arguments. So we'll get three x minus one lesson Ln of two. Let's add one to every part. So that will give us L N two plus one. That will divide everything by three. So we get one third less than X less than Ln of two plus 1/3. So um as lovely. Let's fix that. Three. Make it look a little bit nicer. So that is then uh we were able to solve our inequality so we know what X has to be in between. So that worked well. Alright, awesome. Now we're gonna do part B, part B s, logs. So let's go ahead and start working. This first thing we'll do is subtract one from both sides. So we'll get -2. less than two when you divide by a negative. That changes the inequality. So we're going to divide by -2. That will give us Ln of X Greater than -1. Now we can do uh the inverse function that will get our argument out. So we're going to do to the L. N. Effects Greater than Edith and -1. So therefore access greater than E to the minus one and either minus one. We can write as one over E. So X is greater than one over E. So we have accomplished our task. Alright, have a great day. See you next time.

Get More Help with this Textbook

James Stewart

Calculus: Early Transcendentals

View More Answers From This Book

Find Another Textbook

Study Groups

Study with other students and unlock Numerade solutions for free.

Problem

(a) We must have $e^{x}-3>0 \Leftrightarrow e^{x}…

This textbook answer is only visible when subscribed! Please subscribe to view the answer

More Answers

Related Courses

Calculus: Early Transcendentals

Related Topics

Discussion

Top Calculus 3 Educators

Lily An

Anna Marie Vagnozzi

Heather Zimmers

Kristen Karbon

Calculus 3 Courses

Recommended Videos

Watch More Solved Questions in Chapter 1

Video Transcript

James Stewart

Calculus: Early Transcendentals

Lily An

Anna Marie Vagnozzi

Heather Zimmers

Kristen Karbon

This textbook answer is only visible when subscribed! Please subscribe to view the answer

Calculus: Early Transcendentals

Lily An

Anna Marie Vagnozzi

Heather Zimmers

Kristen Karbon

James StewartCalculus: Early Transcendentals

Lily An

Anna Marie Vagnozzi

Heather Zimmers

Kristen Karbon

James Stewart

Calculus: Early Transcendentals