00:01
Some of the largest in the tax imported on goods are on shoes.
00:06
Strangely, the cheaper shoes, the higher the tariff.
00:09
The highest u .s.
00:10
Tariff, 67%, is on a pair of $3 canvas sneakers.
00:13
While the tariff on $12 sneakers is 37%, and that on $300 tall leather imports is 12%.
00:20
A shoe tariff with a big foot imprint.
00:23
Laura buys either inexpensive canvas sneakers $3 before the tariff or more expensive gym shoes $12 before the tariff for her mini -tebris.
00:32
Children.
00:33
Use an indifference curve budget line analysis to show how imposing these unequal tariffs affects the budget, the bundle of shoes that she buys, compared to that she would buy, would have bought in the absence of tariffs.
00:45
Can you confidently predict whether she'll buy relatively more expensive gym shoes after the tariff? why or why not? the budget constraints attempt to identify the combination of goods and services that the consumer can afford with the given budget and given prices of those goods and services.
01:02
For laura, the allocated income of the is $120 to be spent on canvas sneakers at $3 each pair and gym shoes at $12 a pair.
01:10
The graph measures sneakers, canvas sneakers in the absent and gym shoes at the ordinate.
01:17
In this way, the vertical intercept of the budget constraint is 10 gym shoes and the horizontal intercept of the budget constraint is 40 sneakers.
01:26
Suppose that she is currently buying bundelae, at which she buy 16 canvas shoes and six gym shoes.
01:31
So this is before the tariff consumption.
01:35
And we can see here that it's 10 gym shoes if she doesn't buy any canvas sneakers or 40 canvas sneakers if she doesn't buy any gym shoes...