Question
Suppose that the gravitational force exerted by the sun on the planets were inverse $r$-squared, but not proportional to the planet masses. Would Kepler's third law still be valid in this case?
Step 1
Kepler's Third Law states that the square of the orbital period \( T \) of a planet is directly proportional to the cube of the semi-major axis \( a \) of its orbit, i.e., \( T^2 \propto a^3 \). Show more…
Show all steps
Your feedback will help us improve your experience
Ma Ednelyn Lim and 70 other educators are ready to help you.
Ask a new question
Labs
Want to see this concept in action?
Explore this concept interactively to see how it behaves as you change inputs.
Key Concepts
Recommended Videos
Imagine a world where the force of gravity were proportional to the inverse cube of the distance between two objects ( $\left.F_{\text {gravity }} \propto 1 / r^{3}\right) .$ How would Kepler's law of periods be changed?
According to Newton's version of Kepler's third law, how would the ratio $T^{2} / r^{3}$ change if the mass of the Sun were doubled? (7.1)
Gravitation
Using the Law of Universal Gravitation
According to Newton's third law, Earth exerts a force on the Sun. Does the Sun move in a circular path as Earth goes around it each year? How can this idea be used to determine if nearby stars have planets?
Transcript
Watch the video solution with this free unlock.
EMAIL
PASSWORD