00:03
All righty guys.
00:04
So to go and start with this problem, it looks like with the, i'll have to look at the book and the answers at the same time.
00:11
So for part a, it's asking if the calories, sugar content are linear related.
00:16
And the answer is no, mainly because if you look at the data, you'll have to look on page 213 in your text.
00:22
The data does not appear to follow a linear pattern.
00:26
I kind of see a lot of dots kind of scrambled all over the place.
00:28
It doesn't really seem to be a linear pattern.
00:29
So, no, that's just based on looking at the dots.
00:34
And part b actually confirms that suspicion because the covid determination is only 6 .8 % that's pretty low.
00:39
That means the 6 .8 % of the variation in sugar, which is the y value, by the way, is explained by the lee square's regression line.
00:46
And over 93 % of the variation is explained by other factors.
00:50
So it's not a great predictor right there.
00:54
And part c is a little bit.
00:56
And then does the support? yes, it does.
00:59
Because if it did fall in your pattern, that percentage would be much higher than 6 .8, it'd be probably closer in the 90s, probably.
01:08
Whereas in this case, 90 % is explained by other factors besides the least -score discretion line.
01:13
So it looks like we are right on part a.
01:16
And so for the next one, what i want to go ahead and do is this.
01:20
It looks like we have to draw a scatter diagram.
01:23
So what i did is i took the liberty of typing down all the values.
01:27
You'll find those values on page 213 in the table.
01:30
And i added the last two values, the 80 and the 6, like it says in part c at the very end.
01:35
And i'm going to go ahead and have google sheets create that scattered diagram for me.
01:40
And so i'm going to go, i think it's insert...