The following model was fitted to data on 50 states:
where
$$
\begin{aligned}
& \hat{y}=\text { annual salary of the attorney general of the } \\
& \text { state } \\
& x_1=\text { average annual salary of lawyers, in thou- } \\
& \text { sands of dollars } \\
& x_2=\text { number of bills enacted in previous legisla- } \\
& \text { tive session } \\
& x_3=\text { number of due process reviews by state } \\
& \text { courts that resulted in overturn of legislation } \\
& \text { in previous } 40 \text { years } \\
& x_4=\text { length of term of the attorney general of the } \\
& \text { state } \\
& x_5=\text { dummy variable taking value } 1 \text { if justices of } \\
& \text { the state supreme court can be removed from } \\
&
\end{aligned}
$$
office by the governor, judicial review board, or majority vote of the supreme court and 0 otherwise
$x_6=$ dummy variable taking value 1 if supreme court justices are elected on partisan ballots and 0 otherwise
The numbers in parentheses under the coefficients are the estimated coefficient standard errors.
a. Interpret the estimated coefficient on the dummy variable $x_5$.
b. Interpret the estimated coefficient on the dummy variable $x_6$.
c. Test, at the $5 \%$ level, the null hypothesis that the true coefficient on the dummy variable $x_5$ is 0 against the alternative that it is positive.
d. Test, at the $5 \%$ level, the null hypothesis that the true coefficient on the dummy variable $x_6$ is 0 against the alternative that it is negative.
e. Find and interpret a $95 \%$ confidence level for the parameter $\beta_1$.