Problem

Lake Lanier in Georgia, USA, is a reservoir creat…

07:22

Problem 69 Medium Difficulty

The graph of the acceleration $ a(t) $ of a car measured in $ ft/s^2 $ is shown. Use the Midpoint Rule to estimate the increase in the velocity of the car during the six-second time interval.

Name: the graph of the acceleration at of a car measured in fts2 is shown use the midpoint rule to estimat
Uploaded: 2021-01-23
Duration: 3 min 12 s
Channel: Numerade
Description: The graph of the acceleration $ a(t) $ of a car measured in $ ft/s^2 $ is shown. Use the Midpoint Rule to estimate the increase in the velocity of the car during the six-second time interval.

Answer

$$39.8 \mathrm{ft} / \mathrm{s}$$

Grace H.

Catherine R.

Missouri State University

Caleb E.

Baylor University

Kristen K.

University of Michigan - Ann Arbor

Watch More Solved Questions in Chapter 5

Problem 1

Problem 2

Problem 3

Problem 4

Problem 5

Problem 6

Problem 7

Problem 8

Problem 9

Problem 10

Problem 11

Problem 12

Problem 13

Problem 14

Problem 15

Problem 16

Problem 17

Problem 18

Problem 19

Problem 20

Problem 21

Problem 22

Problem 23

Problem 24

Problem 25

Problem 26

Problem 27

Problem 28

Problem 29

Problem 30

Problem 31

Problem 32

Problem 33

Problem 34

Problem 35

Problem 36

Problem 37

Problem 38

Problem 39

Problem 40

Problem 41

Problem 42

Problem 43

Problem 44

Problem 45

Problem 46

Problem 47

Problem 48

Problem 49

Problem 50

Problem 51

Problem 52

Problem 53

Problem 54

Problem 55

Problem 56

Problem 57

Problem 58

Problem 59

Problem 60

Problem 61

Problem 62

Problem 63

Problem 64

Problem 65

Problem 66

Problem 67

Problem 68

Problem 69

Problem 70

Problem 71

Problem 72

Problem 73

Problem 74

Video Transcript

Okay, let's go ahead and do the calculation in this problem. We're asked to basically find the area under the curve. Okay? Using the midpoint rule. Now, the points are not given to you exactly. And we don't know what the exact function is. So the best that we can do here is to use our eyes to estimate the values. So each individual, what may have a slightly different opinion on what the values are, so the answer is could differ a little bit, but I'll do my best in order to help you solve these kind of problems. No, What I did was split the bottom into equal parts so that the bottom with is equal to one. And of course, the more, Uh um rectangles that you will have, the better the estimation is going to be. I used 66 rectangles simply because it was easy. Mhm. Now the first hike from 0 to 1. It's insignificant. When you plug in the height at 0.5, it's nearly close to zero. I know that it's going to be positive, but I will just use zero. Okay, I indicated zero plus just to keep in mind that it's not exactly zero. Okay, the next height, I am going to use the height at 1.5, which in my eyes looked like it was the height of two. So because the base length is, one area of this rectangle is going to be a two. Similarly, the next point at 2.5, the height to me looked like it was a seven. The next point I used looked like it was the height of 12. Similarly, because it's symmetric, the next point also looked like it ended up being 12. Keeping chart is 345 and when I plug in 5.5, the height seemed like it was around six, and that exhaust all of the rectangles that I have. So the area under the curve using the midpoint rule in my eyes it looked like it was going to be zero plus two plus seven plus 12 times two and a six, so that number adds up to 39. So if your answer is somewhere between I would say 38 to 41 then that is totally acceptable. In my opinion, I think the calculation is probably going to be an underestimate. So it's more likely that you will get 40 or 41 if you'd used more rectangles. Okay. And that is how you answer this question.

Yuki H.

University of California, Berkeley

Related Courses

Calculus 1 / AB

Calculus: Early Transcendentals

Chapter 5

Integrals

Section 4

Indefinite Integrals and the Net Change Theorem