Question

The hadronic decay widths of $\eta_c$ and $\psi(3.1)$ are estimated using $$ \begin{aligned} & \eta_c(\mathrm{c} \overline{\mathrm{c}}) \rightarrow n \mathrm{~g} \rightarrow \text { hadrons } \\ & \psi(\mathrm{c} \overline{\mathrm{c}}) \rightarrow n^{\prime} \mathrm{g} \rightarrow \text { hadrons, } \end{aligned} $$ where $\mathrm{g}$ is a gluon and $n$ and $n^{\prime}$ are integers. These are QCD analogues of the QED process of (2.80). Show that the minimum values of $n$ and $n^{\prime}$ are 2 and 3 , respectively. Properties of the potential between the $\mathrm{c}$ and $\overline{\mathrm{c}}$ can be inferred from the charmonium spectrum. In Chapter 1 , we noted that at small $\mathrm{c}$ and $\overline{\mathrm{c}}$ separations, QCD predicts a Coulomb-type potential $-\alpha_s / r$, but that at large separation $r$, we expect a confining potential which increases with $r$. A glance at the $1 S, 2 S$, and the "center of gravity" of the $P$ levels of Fig. 2.13 shows that the potential is in fact somewhere between Coulomb (which has $2 S$ and $P$ degenerate) and an oscillator potential $V \sim r^2$ (which has the $P$ level halfway between $1 S$ and $2 S$ ). A naive potential, which is phenomenologically rather satisfactory, is $$ V(r)=-\frac{4}{3} \frac{\alpha_s}{r}+a r $$ where $a$ is a constant parameter and $\frac{4}{3}$ is the color factor associated with the quark-gluon coupling $\alpha_s$ [see (2.98)]. Let us now repeat the steps of constructing baryons, but this time include the $\mathrm{c}$ quark. Combining three basic quark multiplets, we find that the analogue of $(2.59)$ is $$ 4 \otimes 4 \otimes 4=20 \oplus 20 \oplus 20 \oplus \overline{4} . $$ $$ s \quad M_s \quad M_A \quad \text { A } $$ Rather than to derive this decomposition, it is better at this stage to use the elegant techniques of group theory (Young tableaux); see, for example, Close (1979). Including spin, (2.64), we can as before form the required symmetric spin-flavor ground state in two ways: either the symmetric 20 with a symmetric spin $\frac{3}{2}$ or a mixed-symmetry 20 with spin $\frac{1}{2}$ constructed in exact analogy to (2.68). Extracting the flavor multiplets from a superposition of three basic (quark) tetrahedra leads to the ground-state baryons of Fig. 2.14a. The spin- $\frac{1}{2}$ multiplet can be viewed as three $S U(3)$ octets propping each other up and based on the edges of a fourth $S U(3)$ octet. In fact, we do not need the elegance of group theory to enumerate the states. For example, the $C=1 \mathrm{spin}-\frac{1}{2}$ baryons are cqq composites with $\mathrm{q}=\mathrm{u}, \mathrm{d}$, or $\mathrm{s}$. The qq decomposition is given in (2.58), namely, $$ 3 \otimes 3=6 \oplus \overline{3}, $$ and the states are shown in Fig. 2.14b. The lightest charmed baryons are the $\Sigma_c$ isospin triplet and $\Lambda_c^{+}$. The observed masses are $$ m\left(\Lambda_c\right)=2.28 \mathrm{GeV}, \quad m\left(\Sigma_c\right)=2.44 \mathrm{GeV} . $$

   The hadronic decay widths of $\eta_c$ and $\psi(3.1)$ are estimated using
$$
\begin{aligned}
& \eta_c(\mathrm{c} \overline{\mathrm{c}}) \rightarrow n \mathrm{~g} \rightarrow \text { hadrons } \\
& \psi(\mathrm{c} \overline{\mathrm{c}}) \rightarrow n^{\prime} \mathrm{g} \rightarrow \text { hadrons, }
\end{aligned}
$$
where $\mathrm{g}$ is a gluon and $n$ and $n^{\prime}$ are integers. These are QCD analogues of the QED process of (2.80). Show that the minimum values of $n$ and $n^{\prime}$ are 2 and 3 , respectively.

Properties of the potential between the $\mathrm{c}$ and $\overline{\mathrm{c}}$ can be inferred from the charmonium spectrum. In Chapter 1 , we noted that at small $\mathrm{c}$ and $\overline{\mathrm{c}}$ separations, QCD predicts a Coulomb-type potential $-\alpha_s / r$, but that at large separation $r$, we expect a confining potential which increases with $r$. A glance at the $1 S, 2 S$, and the "center of gravity" of the $P$ levels of Fig. 2.13 shows that the potential is in fact somewhere between Coulomb (which has $2 S$ and $P$ degenerate) and an oscillator potential $V \sim r^2$ (which has the $P$ level halfway between $1 S$ and $2 S$ ). A naive potential, which is phenomenologically rather satisfactory, is
$$
V(r)=-\frac{4}{3} \frac{\alpha_s}{r}+a r
$$
where $a$ is a constant parameter and $\frac{4}{3}$ is the color factor associated with the quark-gluon coupling $\alpha_s$ [see (2.98)].

Let us now repeat the steps of constructing baryons, but this time include the $\mathrm{c}$ quark. Combining three basic quark multiplets, we find that the analogue of $(2.59)$ is
$$
4 \otimes 4 \otimes 4=20 \oplus 20 \oplus 20 \oplus \overline{4} .
$$
$$
s \quad M_s \quad M_A \quad \text { A }
$$

Rather than to derive this decomposition, it is better at this stage to use the elegant techniques of group theory (Young tableaux); see, for example, Close (1979). Including spin, (2.64), we can as before form the required symmetric spin-flavor ground state in two ways: either the symmetric 20 with a symmetric spin $\frac{3}{2}$ or a mixed-symmetry 20 with spin $\frac{1}{2}$ constructed in exact analogy to (2.68). Extracting the flavor multiplets from a superposition of three basic (quark) tetrahedra leads to the ground-state baryons of Fig. 2.14a.

The spin- $\frac{1}{2}$ multiplet can be viewed as three $S U(3)$ octets propping each other up and based on the edges of a fourth $S U(3)$ octet. In fact, we do not need the elegance of group theory to enumerate the states. For example, the $C=1 \mathrm{spin}-\frac{1}{2}$ baryons are cqq composites with $\mathrm{q}=\mathrm{u}, \mathrm{d}$, or $\mathrm{s}$. The qq decomposition is given in (2.58), namely,
$$
3 \otimes 3=6 \oplus \overline{3},
$$
and the states are shown in Fig. 2.14b. The lightest charmed baryons are the $\Sigma_c$ isospin triplet and $\Lambda_c^{+}$. The observed masses are
$$
m\left(\Lambda_c\right)=2.28 \mathrm{GeV}, \quad m\left(\Sigma_c\right)=2.44 \mathrm{GeV} .
$$
Show more…
Quarks and leptons: introductory course in modern particle physics
Quarks and leptons: introductory course in modern particle physics
Francis Halzen, Alan… 1st Edition
Chapter 2, Problem 27 ↓

Instant Answer

verified

Step 1

1)$. - $\eta_c$ and $\psi(3.1)$ are both mesons consisting of a charm quark ($c$) and an anti-charm quark ($\overline{c}$). - The decay processes involve the transformation of these mesons into hadrons via intermediate gluons ($g$). The number of gluons involved is  Show more…

Show all steps

lock
AceChat toggle button
Close icon
Ace pointing down

Please give Ace some feedback

Your feedback will help us improve your experience

Thumb up icon Thumb down icon
Thanks for your feedback!
Profile picture
The hadronic decay widths of $\eta_c$ and $\psi(3.1)$ are estimated using $$ \begin{aligned} & \eta_c(\mathrm{c} \overline{\mathrm{c}}) \rightarrow n \mathrm{~g} \rightarrow \text { hadrons } \\ & \psi(\mathrm{c} \overline{\mathrm{c}}) \rightarrow n^{\prime} \mathrm{g} \rightarrow \text { hadrons, } \end{aligned} $$ where $\mathrm{g}$ is a gluon and $n$ and $n^{\prime}$ are integers. These are QCD analogues of the QED process of (2.80). Show that the minimum values of $n$ and $n^{\prime}$ are 2 and 3 , respectively. Properties of the potential between the $\mathrm{c}$ and $\overline{\mathrm{c}}$ can be inferred from the charmonium spectrum. In Chapter 1 , we noted that at small $\mathrm{c}$ and $\overline{\mathrm{c}}$ separations, QCD predicts a Coulomb-type potential $-\alpha_s / r$, but that at large separation $r$, we expect a confining potential which increases with $r$. A glance at the $1 S, 2 S$, and the "center of gravity" of the $P$ levels of Fig. 2.13 shows that the potential is in fact somewhere between Coulomb (which has $2 S$ and $P$ degenerate) and an oscillator potential $V \sim r^2$ (which has the $P$ level halfway between $1 S$ and $2 S$ ). A naive potential, which is phenomenologically rather satisfactory, is $$ V(r)=-\frac{4}{3} \frac{\alpha_s}{r}+a r $$ where $a$ is a constant parameter and $\frac{4}{3}$ is the color factor associated with the quark-gluon coupling $\alpha_s$ [see (2.98)]. Let us now repeat the steps of constructing baryons, but this time include the $\mathrm{c}$ quark. Combining three basic quark multiplets, we find that the analogue of $(2.59)$ is $$ 4 \otimes 4 \otimes 4=20 \oplus 20 \oplus 20 \oplus \overline{4} . $$ $$ s \quad M_s \quad M_A \quad \text { A } $$ Rather than to derive this decomposition, it is better at this stage to use the elegant techniques of group theory (Young tableaux); see, for example, Close (1979). Including spin, (2.64), we can as before form the required symmetric spin-flavor ground state in two ways: either the symmetric 20 with a symmetric spin $\frac{3}{2}$ or a mixed-symmetry 20 with spin $\frac{1}{2}$ constructed in exact analogy to (2.68). Extracting the flavor multiplets from a superposition of three basic (quark) tetrahedra leads to the ground-state baryons of Fig. 2.14a. The spin- $\frac{1}{2}$ multiplet can be viewed as three $S U(3)$ octets propping each other up and based on the edges of a fourth $S U(3)$ octet. In fact, we do not need the elegance of group theory to enumerate the states. For example, the $C=1 \mathrm{spin}-\frac{1}{2}$ baryons are cqq composites with $\mathrm{q}=\mathrm{u}, \mathrm{d}$, or $\mathrm{s}$. The qq decomposition is given in (2.58), namely, $$ 3 \otimes 3=6 \oplus \overline{3}, $$ and the states are shown in Fig. 2.14b. The lightest charmed baryons are the $\Sigma_c$ isospin triplet and $\Lambda_c^{+}$. The observed masses are $$ m\left(\Lambda_c\right)=2.28 \mathrm{GeV}, \quad m\left(\Sigma_c\right)=2.44 \mathrm{GeV} . $$
Close icon
Play audio
Feedback
Powered by NumerAI
*

Labs

-

Want to see this concept in action?

NEW

Explore this concept interactively to see how it behaves as you change inputs.

View Labs

*

Key Concepts

-
Charge Conjugation and Decay Selection Rules
In quarkonium decays, the conservation of charge conjugation (C) plays a pivotal role in determining the allowed decay channels. A quark–antiquark bound state such as ?c (which has positive C-parity) can only decay into an even number of gluons, while a state like ? (with negative C-parity) must decay into an odd number. This constraint dictates that the minimal gluon emission for ?c is two and for ? is three, mirroring analogous selection rules found in QED processes.
Multi-Gluon Emission in QCD Decays
In Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD), hadronic decays of quarkonium occur via the emission of gluons that subsequently hadronize. The number of emitted gluons is not arbitrary but is fixed by the conservation laws, including charge conjugation and parity. This multi-gluon emission characterizes how quark–antiquark states transition into a final state of hadrons, and illustrates the non-Abelian nature of QCD as compared to the photon emissions in QED.
Potential Models for Quarkonium
To describe the binding and spectral properties of heavy quarkonia, potential models are employed that incorporate both short-range and long-range interactions. These models often combine a Coulomb-like term, arising from one?gluon exchange at short distances, with a confining term that grows with distance. This combination, exemplified by the Cornell potential, is instrumental in reproducing the energy levels and splittings observed in charmonium and other quarkonium systems.
Group Theoretical Methods in Baryon Classification
The classification of baryons, especially when including heavier quarks such as the charm quark, is efficiently handled using group theory and Young tableaux techniques. By decomposing the product of quark representations, one can systematically predict the multiplet structure of baryonic states. This framework not only organizes known states but also provides a theoretical basis for understanding the symmetry properties underlying the baryon spectrum.
Color Factors and the Quark–Gluon Coupling
Within QCD, the strength of the interaction between quarks and gluons is modulated by color factors, reflecting the non-Abelian gauge symmetry of the theory. A common example is the factor 4/3 that appears in the Coulomb-type potential between a quark and an antiquark. These color factors are essential in quantifying the effective coupling and play a crucial role in the modeling of hadronic interactions and spectra.

*

Recommended Videos

-
group-of-researchers-at-the-university-california-irvine-nnilius-tm-wallis-and-w-ho-have-constructed-one-dimensiona-au-chains-vaous-lengths-using-scanning-tunnelling-microscope-position-indi-35056

Q1 A group of researchers at the University of California at Irvine (N. Nilius, TM Wallis, and W. Ho) have constructed one dimensional Au chains of various lengths using a scanning tunnelling microscope to position individual atoms (see Fig. 1). These gold chains, ranging from a single atom to twenty atoms in length, represent one-dimensional confining potentials and their electronic properties can be understood using the simple 1D particle-in-a-box model which has been covered in the Frontiers lectures. With the STM, the researchers could measure the probability density and energy of a wide variety of electron states in the Au chains. For all questions below, assume that (i) the Au chains can be modelled as a 1D rigid box, i.e. where the potential inside the box is zero and that outside the box is infinite; (ii) the mass of the electron is 9.11 ! 10⁻³¹ kg (a) Write down an equation for the normalised ground state wavefunction (i.e. the n = 1 state) of a chain of Au atoms [1], and then sketch the probability density for the n=1 state of the Au₁ and Au₁₇ chains, respectively†. The sketches should be on the same graph axes. [3] (b) It was found that the energy difference between the n = 1 and n=2 states for a Au₁₇ chain was 47 meV. From this result, determine the length of the Au₁₇ chain. [5] (c) A single gold atom in a chain is 0.29 nm in diameter. For the n=1 state of the Au₁₇ chain, what is the probability of finding an electron in the region corresponding to the gold atom at the centre of the chain? [8] (d) The STM tunnel current was measured at the centre of the Au₁₇ chain for the n=1, 2 and 3 states respectively. For which of these measurements was the tunnel current lowest in value? Why? [3] (e) The Heisenberg uncertainty principle can be written as ΔxΔp ≈ ℏ. Taking a (very rough) estimate of Δx to be L/2, where L is the length of a gold chain, compare the value of the ground state energy (again for the Au₁₇ chain) determined using the uncertainty principle with the value of E₁ derived from the solutions to the Schrodinger equation for the infinite potential well. [5]

Need help? Use Ace
Ace is your personal tutor. It breaks down any question with clear steps so you can learn.
Start Using Ace
Ace is your personal tutor for learning
Step-by-step explanations
Instant summaries
Summarize YouTube videos
Understand textbook images or PDFs
Study tools like quizzes and flashcards
Listen to your notes as a podcast
Continue solving this problem
Create a free account to:
  • View full step-by-step solution
  • Ask follow-up questions with Ace AI
  • Save progress and study later
Continue Free
Numerade

Get step-by-step video solution
from top educators

Continue with Clever
or



By creating an account, you agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
Already have an account? Log In

A free answer
just for you

Watch the video solution with this free unlock.

Numerade

Log in to watch this video
...and 100,000,000 more!


EMAIL

PASSWORD

OR
Continue with Clever