The idea behind moral expectation was that it was necessary...

The idea behind moral expectation was that it was necessary to represent the relative value of a given sum of money not by its face value, but in relation to the capital of the person under consideration. Gabriel Cramer (1704-1752) suggested that the value derived from a sum of money varied with the square root of the sum. Thus the moral expectation in his solution to the St. Petersburg paradox is $$ \begin{aligned} & \sqrt{1}\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)+\sqrt{2}\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^2+\sqrt{4}\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^3+\cdots \\ & +\sqrt{2^{n-1}}\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^n+\cdots \end{aligned} $$ What finite value does this series give?

The idea behind moral expectation was that it was necessary to represent the relative value of a given sum of money not by its face value, but in relation to the capital of the person under consideration. Gabriel Cramer (1704-1752) suggested that the value derived from a sum of money varied with the square root of the sum. Thus the moral expectation in his solution to the St. Petersburg paradox is
$$
\begin{aligned}
& \sqrt{1}\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)+\sqrt{2}\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^2+\sqrt{4}\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^3+\cdots \\
& +\sqrt{2^{n-1}}\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^n+\cdots
\end{aligned}
$$
What finite value does this series give?

Labs

Want to see this concept in action?

NEW

Explore this concept interactively to see how it behaves as you change inputs.

View Labs

Key Concepts

Geometric Series and Convergence

A geometric series is a series where each term is derived by multiplying the previous term by a constant ratio. Determining the finite value of an infinite geometric series involves checking that the absolute value of the common ratio is less than one, which ensures convergence. This mathematical tool is widely used in evaluating sums that arise in theoretical and applied contexts, including those in economics and probability theory.

Expected Utility Theory

Expected utility theory is a framework in decision theory that evaluates options by considering the anticipated utility of outcomes rather than their direct financial value. This approach reflects the idea that people derive subjective satisfaction from wealth, which may not increase linearly with increases in monetary amounts because of risk preferences and other factors.

Diminishing Marginal Utility

Diminishing marginal utility is the principle that as a person’s wealth increases, each additional unit of income or money provides a smaller increase in overall satisfaction or utility. This concept is typically represented with concave functions, such as the square root or logarithmic utility functions, to capture the realistic behavior of individuals under risk.

Transcript

Please give Ace some feedback