00:01
In this example, we are going through a series of graphs and trying to match them to their description.
00:05
So we're given these data points plotted, and all of these have age as the explanatory variable.
00:10
And what we're using here is a sample size of 20 people.
00:14
So we have 20 data points for each graph here, age is the explanatory variable, and we're given these measurements.
00:21
So two of which, 15 and 17, you can see, are measured in thousands of units, whereas 16 and 18 are measured in just units.
00:30
All right, so let's go ahead and start with graph 15 right here.
00:36
So we're looking at age as our explanatory variable measured in thousands of units.
00:39
So which description might match this? well, looking at our descriptions, which one might be in thousands of units.
00:45
So age and body temperature, it wouldn't make sense to measure body temperature in thousands of units.
00:50
So we can rule that out.
00:51
B, age and student loan balance.
00:55
That's possible.
00:55
Student loan balances are probably going to be measured in thousands.
00:58
So it could be that one.
00:59
And c right here, age and income.
01:01
Income, again, is probably going to be measured in thousands of units.
01:04
So it could be that one as well.
01:05
And d, we can rule that out because height is not going to be measured in thousands of units either.
01:09
It's probably going to be measured in inches.
01:11
So we're down to student loan balance and income.
01:15
So let's think this through.
01:15
So for 15, what we see is we have a relatively upward sloping pattern going on.
01:21
So it looks like we have relatively strong positive correlation.
01:24
And what we're likely to see as people are getting older as we go from being 26, a relatively low income or student loan balance to 34 having a relatively high income or student loan balance, which seems more likely...