Question

This is a quantity-setting oligopoly where both firms supply respectively the quantities $x_1, x_2$ and the resulting price (at which all supply is sold) is $p=1-x_1-x_2$. Production involves consideration of a fixed cost $a>0$ to produce any positive amount of the good, and no variable cost. Hence the game $$ \begin{aligned} & x_1=x_2=[0,1] \\ & \mathrm{u}_{\mathrm{i}}\left(\mathrm{x}_1, \mathrm{x}_2\right)=\mathrm{x}_{\mathrm{i}}\left(1-\mathrm{x}_1-\mathrm{x}_2\right)-\mathrm{a} \\ & =0 \\ & \end{aligned} $$ We discuss this game with respect to the parameter a. a) Show that for a small ( $0<a<\alpha$ for some $\alpha$ to be computed) the game is strategically similar to the costless game $(a=0)$. There is a unique Nash equilibrium; it is also the sophisticated equilibrium of the game. b) For a not-too-small and not-too-big ( $\alpha \leq a \leq \beta$ for some $\beta$ to be computed) there are three equilibria (in pure strategies). One of them is the sophisticated equilibrium. c) For a large $(\beta<a \leq 1 / 4)$ there are two asymmetrical equilibria in pure strategies, where only one firm is active. In this case there is also a symmetrical equilibrium in mixed strategies (see Chapter 7 below).

   This is a quantity-setting oligopoly where both firms supply respectively the quantities $x_1, x_2$ and the resulting price (at which all supply is sold) is $p=1-x_1-x_2$. Production involves consideration of a fixed cost $a>0$ to produce any positive amount of the good, and no variable cost. Hence the game
$$
\begin{aligned}
& x_1=x_2=[0,1] \\
& \mathrm{u}_{\mathrm{i}}\left(\mathrm{x}_1, \mathrm{x}_2\right)=\mathrm{x}_{\mathrm{i}}\left(1-\mathrm{x}_1-\mathrm{x}_2\right)-\mathrm{a} \\
& =0 \\
&
\end{aligned}
$$
We discuss this game with respect to the parameter a.
a) Show that for a small ( $0<a<\alpha$ for some $\alpha$ to be computed) the game is strategically similar to the costless game $(a=0)$. There is a unique Nash equilibrium; it is also the sophisticated equilibrium of the game. b) For a not-too-small and not-too-big ( $\alpha \leq a \leq \beta$ for some $\beta$ to be computed) there are three equilibria (in pure strategies). One of them is the sophisticated equilibrium. c) For a large $(\beta<a \leq 1 / 4)$ there are two asymmetrical equilibria in pure strategies, where only one firm is active. In this case there is also a symmetrical equilibrium in mixed strategies (see Chapter 7 below).
Show more…
Game Theory for the Social Sciences
Game Theory for the Social Sciences
Herve Moulin 1st Edition
Chapter 5, Problem 8 ↓

Instant Answer

verified

Step 1

In the costless game $(a=0)$, the players' payoffs are given by $u_i(x_1, x_2) = x_i(1-x_1-x_2)$.  Show more…

Show all steps

lock
AceChat toggle button
Close icon
Ace pointing down

Please give Ace some feedback

Your feedback will help us improve your experience

Thumb up icon Thumb down icon
Thanks for your feedback!
Profile picture
This is a quantity-setting oligopoly where both firms supply respectively the quantities $x_1, x_2$ and the resulting price (at which all supply is sold) is $p=1-x_1-x_2$. Production involves consideration of a fixed cost $a>0$ to produce any positive amount of the good, and no variable cost. Hence the game $$ \begin{aligned} & x_1=x_2=[0,1] \\ & \mathrm{u}_{\mathrm{i}}\left(\mathrm{x}_1, \mathrm{x}_2\right)=\mathrm{x}_{\mathrm{i}}\left(1-\mathrm{x}_1-\mathrm{x}_2\right)-\mathrm{a} \\ & =0 \\ & \end{aligned} $$ We discuss this game with respect to the parameter a. a) Show that for a small ( $0<a<\alpha$ for some $\alpha$ to be computed) the game is strategically similar to the costless game $(a=0)$. There is a unique Nash equilibrium; it is also the sophisticated equilibrium of the game. b) For a not-too-small and not-too-big ( $\alpha \leq a \leq \beta$ for some $\beta$ to be computed) there are three equilibria (in pure strategies). One of them is the sophisticated equilibrium. c) For a large $(\beta<a \leq 1 / 4)$ there are two asymmetrical equilibria in pure strategies, where only one firm is active. In this case there is also a symmetrical equilibrium in mixed strategies (see Chapter 7 below).
Close icon
Play audio
Feedback
Powered by NumerAI
Need help? Use Ace
Ace is your personal tutor. It breaks down any question with clear steps so you can learn.
Start Using Ace
Ace is your personal tutor for learning
Step-by-step explanations
Instant summaries
Summarize YouTube videos
Understand textbook images or PDFs
Study tools like quizzes and flashcards
Listen to your notes as a podcast
Continue solving this problem
Create a free account to:
  • View full step-by-step solution
  • Ask follow-up questions with Ace AI
  • Save progress and study later
Continue Free
Join the community

18,000,000+

Students on Numerade


Trusted by students at 8,000+ universities

Numerade

Get step-by-step video solution
from top educators

Continue with Clever
or



By creating an account, you agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
Already have an account? Log In

A free answer
just for you

Watch the video solution with this free unlock.

Numerade

Log in to watch this video
...and 100,000,000 more!


EMAIL

PASSWORD

OR
Continue with Clever