00:01
Part 1, we obtain these results using polde ls.
00:32
The coefficient on d90 is positive and very significant.
00:46
Its coefficient implies that nominal rents grew by over 26 % over the 10 -year period.
01:04
All else equal.
01:05
The coefficient on percent stu means that a 1 percentage point increase in pct stu increases rent by half a percent.
02:21
This variable has a t statistic of 5, meaning at least based on the usual analysis, pct stu is very statistically significant.
02:44
Part 2, the standard errone we got from part 1 are not valid unless we think a -sub -i, the heterogeneity component does not really appear in the equation.
03:09
If a sub -i is in the error term, the errors across the two time periods for each city are positively correlated and this invalidates the usual ols standard errors in t statistic.
04:00
Part 3, this is the result from first differencing.
04:11
The left -hand side becomes the change in the log of rent or the percentage change in rent.
04:29
So before we get 128 observations and after the percentage of the percentage of the rate, differencing we have only half of that we have 64 observations and we have a smaller r square what we care about is the estimate on pcts you we find that the effect of pct stu is over twice as large as we estimated in the poland ols equation now a 1 -2 percentage point increase in pct sdu is estimated to increase rental rates by about 1 .1%...