00:01
First of all, i want to state that the data is coming from exercise 41, which is a data set of costs of toyotas.
00:09
And those were put into a list in a calculator, list 1 and 2.
00:13
And then we're given the slope intercept, slope and intercept for this.
00:17
So the equation, linear regression equation, will be the price of the car equals 14 ,286, that comes out as the intercept, minus 959 times the years.
00:36
The slope is minus 959.
00:41
Let me fix that up.
00:43
That's a five, nine, 959 times the years.
00:48
To interpret the slope, as the car gets one year older, the car is going to drop by 959 dollars in price.
00:57
So each year the car is depreciating or going down 959 dollars.
01:04
Interpreting the intercept, when the car is brand new, zero years old, it would cost 14 ,286.
01:12
That's what the cost of the car would be at the purchase price, at the very beginning, when it's brand new or zero years old.
01:20
For d, if i'm going to predict the price of a seven -year -old car here, i'm going to plug in seven into that equation that i wrote for part a and then just solve.
01:28
So 14 ,286 minus 959 times seven is 7 ,573 dollars.
01:37
So that's what a seven -year -old toyota would be.
01:42
Would you rather purchase a car for the negative or positive residual? you want it to be negative because that would mean that the actual price, the actual cost of the car, would be lower than predicted.
01:57
So we'd want to have a negative residual, lower than predicted, because that means we got a better deal than what was predicted on there.
02:09
So actual lower than predicted, that's the negative residual.
02:14
For f, they said that the actual price of this car was 3 ,500 and it's a ten -year -old car...