Question

Verify the isospin factor $\sqrt{2}$ in (12.19). Note that ${ }^{14} \mathrm{C}$, ${ }^{14} \mathrm{~N}^*,{ }^{14} \mathrm{O}$ form an isospin triplet, which can be viewed as $\mathrm{nn}, \mathrm{np}, \mathrm{pp}$, together with an isospin zero ${ }^{12} \mathrm{C}$ core (see Fig. 2.2). Keep in mind that for indistinguishable proton decays, we must add amplitudes, not probabilities. The rate $d \Gamma$ for the " $\mathrm{p}$ " $\rightarrow$ " $\mathrm{n}^{\prime} \mathrm{e}^{+} \nu$ transition is related to $|9|^2$ by (4.36). We obtain $$ \begin{aligned} d \Gamma= & G^2 \sum_{\text {spins }}\left|\bar{u}\left(p_v\right) \gamma^0\left(1-\gamma^5\right) v\left(p_e\right)\right|^2 \frac{d^3 p_e}{(2 \pi)^3 2 E_e} \\ & \times \frac{d^3 p_\nu}{(2 \pi)^3 2 E_\nu} 2 \pi \delta\left(E_0-E_e-E_v\right), \end{aligned} $$ where $E_0$ is the energy released to the lepton pair. The normalization factor $\left(2 m_N\right)^2$ cancels with the equivalent $2 E_p 2 E_n$ factor in (4.36), as indeed it must. The summation over spins can be performed using the techniques we introduced in Chapter 6. Neglecting the mass of the electron, we have $$ \begin{aligned} \sum_{\text {spins }}\left|\bar{u} \gamma^0\left(1-\gamma^5\right) v\right|^2 & =\sum\left(\bar{u} \gamma^0\left(1-\gamma^5\right) v\right)\left(\bar{v}\left(1+\gamma^5\right) \gamma^0 u\right) \\ & =\operatorname{Tr}\left(p_\nu \gamma^0\left(1-\gamma^5\right) p_e\left(1+\gamma^5\right) \gamma^0\right) \\ & =2 \operatorname{Tr}\left(p_v \gamma^0 p_e\left(1+\gamma^5\right) \gamma^0\right) \\ & =8\left(E_e E_v+\mathbf{p}_e \cdot \mathbf{p}_v\right) \\ & =8 E_e E_v\left(1+v_e \cos \theta\right), \end{aligned} $$ where $\theta$ is the opening angle between the two leptons and where the electron velocity $v_e=1$ in our approximation. Here, we have used the trace theorems of Section 6.4 ; see also (12.25) and (12.26). Substituting (12.21) into (12.20), the transition rate becomes $$ d \Gamma=\frac{2 G^2}{(2 \pi)^5}(1+\cos \theta)\left[\left(2 \pi d \cos \theta p_e^2 d p_e\right)\left(4 \pi E_\nu^2 d E_v\right)\right] \delta\left(E_0-E_e-E_v\right), $$ where $d^3 p_e d^3 p_v$ has been replaced by the expression in the square brackets. Many experiments focus attention on the energy spectrum of the emitted positron. From (12.22), we obtain $$ \begin{aligned} \frac{d \Gamma}{d p_e} & =\frac{4 G^2}{(2 \pi)^3} p_e^2\left(E_0-E_e\right)^2 \int d \cos \theta(1+\cos \theta) \\ & =\frac{G^2}{\pi^3} p_e^2\left(E_0-E_e\right)^2 . \end{aligned} $$ Thus, if from the observed positron spectrum we plot $p_e^{-1}\left(d \Gamma / d p_e\right)^{1 / 2}$ as a function of $E_e$, we should obtain a linear plot with end point $E_0$. This is called the Kurie plot. It can be used to check whether the neutrino mass is indeed zero. A nonvanishing neutrino mass destroys the linear behavior, particularly for $E_e$ near $E_0$. (In practice, of course, we must examine the approximations we have made, correct $E_e$ for the energy gained from the nuclear Coulomb field, and allow for the experimental energy resolution.) Our immediate interest here is of a different nature. We wish to determine $G$ from the observed value $E_0$ and the measured lifetime $\tau$ of the nuclear state to $\beta$-decay. We therefore carry out the $d p_e$ integration of (12.23) over the interval $0, E_0$. Making the relativistic approximation $p_e \approx E_e$, we find $$ \Gamma=\frac{1}{\tau}=\frac{G^2 E_0^5}{30 \pi^3} . $$ Now, for ${ }^{14} \mathrm{O} \rightarrow{ }^{14} \mathrm{~N}^* \mathrm{e}^{+} \nu$, the nuclear energy difference $E_0$ is $1.81 \mathrm{MeV}$, and the measured half-life is $\tau \log 2=71 \mathrm{sec}$. Using this information, we find $$ G \simeq 10^{-5} / m_N^2 \text {. } $$ Recall that $G$ has dimension (mass) ${ }^{-2}$. We have chosen to quote the value with respect to the nucleon mass.

   Verify the isospin factor $\sqrt{2}$ in (12.19). Note that ${ }^{14} \mathrm{C}$, ${ }^{14} \mathrm{~N}^*,{ }^{14} \mathrm{O}$ form an isospin triplet, which can be viewed as $\mathrm{nn}, \mathrm{np}, \mathrm{pp}$, together with an isospin zero ${ }^{12} \mathrm{C}$ core (see Fig. 2.2). Keep in mind that for indistinguishable proton decays, we must add amplitudes, not probabilities.

The rate $d \Gamma$ for the " $\mathrm{p}$ " $\rightarrow$ " $\mathrm{n}^{\prime} \mathrm{e}^{+} \nu$ transition is related to $|9|^2$ by (4.36). We obtain
$$
\begin{aligned}
d \Gamma= & G^2 \sum_{\text {spins }}\left|\bar{u}\left(p_v\right) \gamma^0\left(1-\gamma^5\right) v\left(p_e\right)\right|^2 \frac{d^3 p_e}{(2 \pi)^3 2 E_e} \\
& \times \frac{d^3 p_\nu}{(2 \pi)^3 2 E_\nu} 2 \pi \delta\left(E_0-E_e-E_v\right),
\end{aligned}
$$
where $E_0$ is the energy released to the lepton pair. The normalization factor $\left(2 m_N\right)^2$ cancels with the equivalent $2 E_p 2 E_n$ factor in (4.36), as indeed it must. The summation over spins can be performed using the techniques we introduced in Chapter 6. Neglecting the mass of the electron, we have
$$
\begin{aligned}
\sum_{\text {spins }}\left|\bar{u} \gamma^0\left(1-\gamma^5\right) v\right|^2 & =\sum\left(\bar{u} \gamma^0\left(1-\gamma^5\right) v\right)\left(\bar{v}\left(1+\gamma^5\right) \gamma^0 u\right) \\
& =\operatorname{Tr}\left(p_\nu \gamma^0\left(1-\gamma^5\right) p_e\left(1+\gamma^5\right) \gamma^0\right) \\
& =2 \operatorname{Tr}\left(p_v \gamma^0 p_e\left(1+\gamma^5\right) \gamma^0\right) \\
& =8\left(E_e E_v+\mathbf{p}_e \cdot \mathbf{p}_v\right) \\
& =8 E_e E_v\left(1+v_e \cos \theta\right),
\end{aligned}
$$
where $\theta$ is the opening angle between the two leptons and where the electron velocity $v_e=1$ in our approximation. Here, we have used the trace theorems of Section 6.4 ; see also (12.25) and (12.26). Substituting (12.21) into (12.20), the transition rate becomes
$$
d \Gamma=\frac{2 G^2}{(2 \pi)^5}(1+\cos \theta)\left[\left(2 \pi d \cos \theta p_e^2 d p_e\right)\left(4 \pi E_\nu^2 d E_v\right)\right] \delta\left(E_0-E_e-E_v\right),
$$
where $d^3 p_e d^3 p_v$ has been replaced by the expression in the square brackets.
Many experiments focus attention on the energy spectrum of the emitted positron. From (12.22), we obtain
$$
\begin{aligned}
\frac{d \Gamma}{d p_e} & =\frac{4 G^2}{(2 \pi)^3} p_e^2\left(E_0-E_e\right)^2 \int d \cos \theta(1+\cos \theta) \\
& =\frac{G^2}{\pi^3} p_e^2\left(E_0-E_e\right)^2 .
\end{aligned}
$$

Thus, if from the observed positron spectrum we plot $p_e^{-1}\left(d \Gamma / d p_e\right)^{1 / 2}$ as a function of $E_e$, we should obtain a linear plot with end point $E_0$. This is called the Kurie plot. It can be used to check whether the neutrino mass is indeed zero. A nonvanishing neutrino mass destroys the linear behavior, particularly for $E_e$ near $E_0$. (In practice, of course, we must examine the approximations we have made, correct $E_e$ for the energy gained from the nuclear Coulomb field, and allow for the experimental energy resolution.)

Our immediate interest here is of a different nature. We wish to determine $G$ from the observed value $E_0$ and the measured lifetime $\tau$ of the nuclear state to $\beta$-decay. We therefore carry out the $d p_e$ integration of (12.23) over the interval $0, E_0$. Making the relativistic approximation $p_e \approx E_e$, we find
$$
\Gamma=\frac{1}{\tau}=\frac{G^2 E_0^5}{30 \pi^3} .
$$

Now, for ${ }^{14} \mathrm{O} \rightarrow{ }^{14} \mathrm{~N}^* \mathrm{e}^{+} \nu$, the nuclear energy difference $E_0$ is $1.81 \mathrm{MeV}$, and the measured half-life is $\tau \log 2=71 \mathrm{sec}$. Using this information, we find
$$
G \simeq 10^{-5} / m_N^2 \text {. }
$$

Recall that $G$ has dimension (mass) ${ }^{-2}$. We have chosen to quote the value with respect to the nucleon mass.
Show more…
Quarks and leptons: introductory course in modern particle physics
Quarks and leptons: introductory course in modern particle physics
Francis Halzen, Alan… 1st Edition
Chapter 12, Problem 4 ↓

Instant Answer

verified

Step 1

In terms of nucleon pairs, they can be represented as $\mathrm{nn}$, $\mathrm{np}$, and $\mathrm{pp}$ respectively, with a ${ }^{12} \mathrm{C}$ core which has isospin zero. This implies that the transitions between these states can be analyzed using isospin  Show more…

Show all steps

lock
AceChat toggle button
Close icon
Ace pointing down

Please give Ace some feedback

Your feedback will help us improve your experience

Thumb up icon Thumb down icon
Thanks for your feedback!
Profile picture
Verify the isospin factor $\sqrt{2}$ in (12.19). Note that ${ }^{14} \mathrm{C}$, ${ }^{14} \mathrm{~N}^*,{ }^{14} \mathrm{O}$ form an isospin triplet, which can be viewed as $\mathrm{nn}, \mathrm{np}, \mathrm{pp}$, together with an isospin zero ${ }^{12} \mathrm{C}$ core (see Fig. 2.2). Keep in mind that for indistinguishable proton decays, we must add amplitudes, not probabilities. The rate $d \Gamma$ for the " $\mathrm{p}$ " $\rightarrow$ " $\mathrm{n}^{\prime} \mathrm{e}^{+} \nu$ transition is related to $|9|^2$ by (4.36). We obtain $$ \begin{aligned} d \Gamma= & G^2 \sum_{\text {spins }}\left|\bar{u}\left(p_v\right) \gamma^0\left(1-\gamma^5\right) v\left(p_e\right)\right|^2 \frac{d^3 p_e}{(2 \pi)^3 2 E_e} \\ & \times \frac{d^3 p_\nu}{(2 \pi)^3 2 E_\nu} 2 \pi \delta\left(E_0-E_e-E_v\right), \end{aligned} $$ where $E_0$ is the energy released to the lepton pair. The normalization factor $\left(2 m_N\right)^2$ cancels with the equivalent $2 E_p 2 E_n$ factor in (4.36), as indeed it must. The summation over spins can be performed using the techniques we introduced in Chapter 6. Neglecting the mass of the electron, we have $$ \begin{aligned} \sum_{\text {spins }}\left|\bar{u} \gamma^0\left(1-\gamma^5\right) v\right|^2 & =\sum\left(\bar{u} \gamma^0\left(1-\gamma^5\right) v\right)\left(\bar{v}\left(1+\gamma^5\right) \gamma^0 u\right) \\ & =\operatorname{Tr}\left(p_\nu \gamma^0\left(1-\gamma^5\right) p_e\left(1+\gamma^5\right) \gamma^0\right) \\ & =2 \operatorname{Tr}\left(p_v \gamma^0 p_e\left(1+\gamma^5\right) \gamma^0\right) \\ & =8\left(E_e E_v+\mathbf{p}_e \cdot \mathbf{p}_v\right) \\ & =8 E_e E_v\left(1+v_e \cos \theta\right), \end{aligned} $$ where $\theta$ is the opening angle between the two leptons and where the electron velocity $v_e=1$ in our approximation. Here, we have used the trace theorems of Section 6.4 ; see also (12.25) and (12.26). Substituting (12.21) into (12.20), the transition rate becomes $$ d \Gamma=\frac{2 G^2}{(2 \pi)^5}(1+\cos \theta)\left[\left(2 \pi d \cos \theta p_e^2 d p_e\right)\left(4 \pi E_\nu^2 d E_v\right)\right] \delta\left(E_0-E_e-E_v\right), $$ where $d^3 p_e d^3 p_v$ has been replaced by the expression in the square brackets. Many experiments focus attention on the energy spectrum of the emitted positron. From (12.22), we obtain $$ \begin{aligned} \frac{d \Gamma}{d p_e} & =\frac{4 G^2}{(2 \pi)^3} p_e^2\left(E_0-E_e\right)^2 \int d \cos \theta(1+\cos \theta) \\ & =\frac{G^2}{\pi^3} p_e^2\left(E_0-E_e\right)^2 . \end{aligned} $$ Thus, if from the observed positron spectrum we plot $p_e^{-1}\left(d \Gamma / d p_e\right)^{1 / 2}$ as a function of $E_e$, we should obtain a linear plot with end point $E_0$. This is called the Kurie plot. It can be used to check whether the neutrino mass is indeed zero. A nonvanishing neutrino mass destroys the linear behavior, particularly for $E_e$ near $E_0$. (In practice, of course, we must examine the approximations we have made, correct $E_e$ for the energy gained from the nuclear Coulomb field, and allow for the experimental energy resolution.) Our immediate interest here is of a different nature. We wish to determine $G$ from the observed value $E_0$ and the measured lifetime $\tau$ of the nuclear state to $\beta$-decay. We therefore carry out the $d p_e$ integration of (12.23) over the interval $0, E_0$. Making the relativistic approximation $p_e \approx E_e$, we find $$ \Gamma=\frac{1}{\tau}=\frac{G^2 E_0^5}{30 \pi^3} . $$ Now, for ${ }^{14} \mathrm{O} \rightarrow{ }^{14} \mathrm{~N}^* \mathrm{e}^{+} \nu$, the nuclear energy difference $E_0$ is $1.81 \mathrm{MeV}$, and the measured half-life is $\tau \log 2=71 \mathrm{sec}$. Using this information, we find $$ G \simeq 10^{-5} / m_N^2 \text {. } $$ Recall that $G$ has dimension (mass) ${ }^{-2}$. We have chosen to quote the value with respect to the nucleon mass.
Close icon
Play audio
Feedback
Powered by NumerAI
Need help? Use Ace
Ace is your personal tutor. It breaks down any question with clear steps so you can learn.
Start Using Ace
Ace is your personal tutor for learning
Step-by-step explanations
Instant summaries
Summarize YouTube videos
Understand textbook images or PDFs
Study tools like quizzes and flashcards
Listen to your notes as a podcast
Continue solving this problem
Create a free account to:
  • View full step-by-step solution
  • Ask follow-up questions with Ace AI
  • Save progress and study later
Continue Free
Numerade

Get step-by-step video solution
from top educators

Continue with Clever
or



By creating an account, you agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
Already have an account? Log In

A free answer
just for you

Watch the video solution with this free unlock.

Numerade

Log in to watch this video
...and 100,000,000 more!


EMAIL

PASSWORD

OR
Continue with Clever