Problem

What is wrong with the equation? $ \displaysty…

02:10

Question

Answered step-by-step

Problem 56 Easy Difficulty

What is wrong with the equation?

$ \displaystyle \int^2_{-1} \frac{4}{x^3} \, dx = -\frac{2}{x^2} \Bigg]^2_{-1} = -\frac{3}{2} $

Video Answer

Solved by verified expert

Textbook Answer

Official textbook answer

Video by Yuki Hotta

Numerade Educator

This textbook answer is only visible when subscribed! Please subscribe to view the answer

Watch More Solved Questions in Chapter 5

Problem 1

Problem 2

Problem 3

Problem 4

Problem 5

Problem 6

Problem 7

Problem 8

Problem 9

Problem 10

Problem 11

Problem 12

Problem 13

Problem 14

Problem 15

Problem 16

Problem 17

Problem 18

Problem 19

Problem 20

Problem 21

Problem 22

Problem 23

Problem 24

Problem 25

Problem 26

Problem 27

Problem 28

Problem 29

Problem 30

Problem 31

Problem 32

Problem 33

Problem 34

Problem 35

Problem 36

Problem 37

Problem 38

Problem 39

Problem 40

Problem 41

Problem 42

Problem 43

Problem 44

Problem 45

Problem 46

Problem 47

Problem 48

Problem 49

Problem 50

Problem 51

Problem 52

Problem 53

Problem 54

Problem 55

Problem 56

Problem 57

Problem 58

Problem 59

Problem 60

Problem 61

Problem 62

Problem 63

Problem 64

Problem 65

Problem 66

Problem 67

Problem 68

Problem 69

Problem 70

Problem 71

Problem 72

Problem 73

Problem 74

Problem 75

Problem 76

Problem 77

Problem 78

Problem 79

Problem 80

Problem 81

Problem 82

Problem 83

Problem 84

Problem 85

Problem 86

Video Transcript

Okay, so let's go through one of thieve Eri common mistakes that a lot of people make when we do into So you see a rational function right here and then we're going to try to take the integral and evaluated from negative 1 to 2. So if you remember the power rule, the integral basically says if I take the anti derivative with respect to X, you will have X to the n plus one, all divided by M plus one. So, using that idea, you can consider execute as X to the negative three. So the expression basically boils down to negative two over X squared, and then you're going to evaluate it from negative 1 to 2. If you plug in the numbers, the first number is going to be negative to over four. You're going to subtract negative two divided by one. So it simplifies into negative three over to looks good, right? But it turns out that this is actually not a proper integral. It's not one of those things where we are allowed to do these calculations. Okay, Why? It will make sense when you actually graph it. The graph off four over X cubed. As you can see, you have a variable on the denominator. So when you have things like that, by the time you're doing calculates, most of most people are aware of this. But you have to be very mindful that if x zero there's going to be a division by zero, so many weird things could happen, right? So the integration limit is from negative 1 to 2, which actually includes zero. So if I take a look at it, the graph roughly roughly looks something like this. And then what we're trying to do is to try to evaluate the values from here, too. There, quote unquote under the curb, which goes all the way down to infinity, comes all the way up from infinity, and then we're trying to calculate that area. And as you can see, it blows up very quickly. So it doesn't make sense to say that it's going to be negative three over to, especially because we know that this portion looks like it's going to be bigger than at least this portion, right? So things doesn't make sense when you don't do the proper, Um, when you don't use when you don't follow the proper rules. In this case, this is not a continuous function between the interval negative 1 to 2, and that that makes this an improper interval. So you have to take steps to make sure that you're doing it the correct way.

Get More Help with this Textbook

James Stewart

Calculus: Early Transcendentals

View More Answers From This Book

Find Another Textbook

Study Groups

Study with other students and unlock Numerade solutions for free.

Problem