00:01
This question addresses the important periodic trend of atomic radius and how it basically is laid out and how we can utilize the periodic table to help us with this trend.
00:12
We're going to answer a series of questions determining whether they're true or false based on what we see according to this trend on the periodic table.
00:21
So the first question we're looking at right here, letter a, is the question is, do we see a bigger gap or an increase? and distance as we transition from shell 2 to 3 as compared to transitioning between shells 3 and 4.
00:39
And so you can tell from my lovely diagram here as it's laid out that what ends up happening is, if this is shell 1 in the center here, that as we add shell number 2, there's a fairly big gap that results from adding that next shell.
01:02
And that distance is fairly large between shell 1 and 2.
01:08
But notice what happens when we add shell number 3.
01:11
That gap closes and it's less distance as we add shell number 3.
01:18
And that's going to be a trend that we see with each additional shell that we add.
01:23
The gap or the energy level that's between each subsequent shell gets less and less.
01:31
There's a lower gap there.
01:32
So indeed, this is a true statement that each shell that we add, as we get farther and farther from that nucleus, there's less of a gap to cover or less of an energy difference between the shells as we continue to add or build that atom.
01:51
Number letter b asks, is it true that, especially for the representative elements, that we see a decrease in radius as you move left, to right across any row on the periodic table.
02:05
And indeed, that is true.
02:08
That is a general periodic trend for atomic radius.
02:11
I tell students think about it as moving from being a big and bulky metal, which are metals are generally going to be located on the left side of the periodic table, toward a smaller electron -hungry kind of non -metal on the right side of the periodic table.
02:28
And what ends up happening is effective nuclear charge or the ability to attract electrons toward itself, especially those outermost valence electrons, is much larger for non -metals than it is for metals.
02:43
And so that results in an overall decrease in radius or a more close contact for valence electrons toward the inner nucleus for non -metals on the right side of the periodic table than for metals on the left.
02:58
So this too is a true statement.
03:02
C asks us, is it true that as we move down the periodic table and we look at row number three where we would have shell number three corresponding to those valence electrons? is it true that in general if we compare the second row of the periodic table with the valence electrons in shell number two versus the third row of the periodic table that we're going to see a noticeably larger increase or larger radii for those species that are corresponding to the atoms that are just above them in row number two...