true or false
A prediction is an inductive argument form.
Application of natural laws to future events is usually interpreted as inductive.
Inductive reasoning is a matter of degree, while deductive reasoning is not a matter of degree.
Any argument with a clear deductive form is best interpreted as deductive.
In an inductive argument, the arguer claims that it is unlikely that the conclusion is false given that the premises are true.
Specific instances of cause and effect cannot be known with absolute certainty.
In an inductive argument, the content of the conclusion does not go beyond the content of the premises.
An "either... or..." statement is a disjunction.
If a generalization uses a very large sample group, then the generalization is deductive.
A categorical syllogism is the same as a generalization, since they can both have general statements as their conclusions.
If a deductive argument is a good one, it is possible for the premises to be true and the conclusion to be false.
If an authority is a qualified one, then an argument based on that authority will be deductive.
Geometry should be considered inductive because it sometimes uses analogies.
Deductive and inductive arguments make equally strong inferential claims.
A categorical syllogism is inductive because it uses probabilistic reasoning.