Ace - AI Tutor
Ask Our Educators
Textbooks
My Library
Flashcards
Scribe - AI Notes
Notes & Exams
Download App
erica martinez

erica m.

Divider

Questions asked

BEST MATCH

P13-17 Evaluating Foreign Operations For many years, Clark Company operated exclusively in the United States but recently expanded its operations to the Pacific Rim countries of New Zealand, Singapore, and Australia. After a modest beginning in these countries, recent successes have resulted in an increased level of operations in each country. Operating information (in thousands of U.S. dollars) for the company's domestic and foreign operations follows. United States New Zealand Singapore Australia Sales to unaffiliated $2,500 $320 $60 $120 Interarea sales 100 Operating expenses 1,820 290 70 30 Long-lived assets 2,200 280 140 80 In addition, common costs of $120,000 are to be allocated to operations on the basis of the ratio of an area's sales to nonaffiliates to total company sales to nonaffiliates. Required a. Determine the profit or loss for each geographic segment. b. Discuss the general reporting requirements related to the company's geographic areas. c. Determine which, if any, of the three individual foreign geographic segments is separately reportable using a 10 percent materiality threshold.

View Answer
divider
BEST MATCH

Marnie, a single taxpayer, projects $14,450 of expenses qualifying as itemized deductions in both 2023 and 2024. Required: Assuming that the standard deduction is $13,850 in both years, compute the effect on taxable income for each year if Marnie can shift $2,500 of deductible expenses from 2023 and 2024.

View Answer
divider
BEST MATCH

What is one objection to Marquis' pro-life argument? A. Marquis' account of the wrongness of killing would entail that it’s possible that the futures of some actual nonhuman mammals on our planet are sufficiently like ours that it is seriously wrong to kill them also. However, mammals can't have a valuable future like ours because they don't have a soul. Having a soul is necessary to having a valuable future, according to Marquis. B. Fetuses are not connected in the right way to their valuable futures. Marquis seems to move from an adult human being like us (i.e. persons) having a valuable future to the fetuses having “futures of value.” That is, he’s first talking about a subjectively valuable future and shifting to discuss an objectively valuable future (future of value). Normal adult humans can value their future from their perspective -- they have future-directed mental states. Fetuses cannot value their future from their perspective and are not connected (yet) to their valuable future. C. Marquis’ anti-abortion argument becomes a pro-infanticide argument. If fetuses have a valuable-future-like-ours, then it is not possible for an infant to have a future-like-ours. Thus, it seems worse to kill a fetus than it is to kill an infant, given that the infant does not have a future of value, according to Marquis. D. Marquis’ account of the wrongness of killing wrongly implies that it is less bad to kill young people than it is to kill old people. Simply put, younger people have less of a valuable future than older people, so it seems worse to kill an old person compared to that of an younger person

View Answer
divider
BEST MATCH

Prove that a positive integer n is divisible by 5 if and only if its last digit is 0 or 5. (You need to provide a formal proof for this). Hint: Any integer n can be expressed using the digits of n as (ak, ak-1, ak-2, ..., a1, a0) ∈ {0, 1, 2, ..., 9}k+1 for some k ≥ 1. n = 10kak + 10k-1ak-1 + ... 10a1 + a0. Try different integers in this format. Then try to focus on what happens when you divide this expression by 5. Grading Notes: While detailed rubric cannot be provided in advance as it would give away the solution, use the following direction to understand how the points are distributed for the problem.

View Answer
divider
BEST MATCH

Name Arane Hazel F. Nual Gr./Sec. \( \qquad \) Date 09-06,-24Score A) 1. Suppose a female with normal vision marries a colorblind male, what will be the possible ratio of the genotype and phenotype of their children if they will have any? \( \qquad \) Genotype of female (normal) \( =X X \) Genotype of male (color blind) \( =X^{C} Y \) F \begin{tabular}{|l|l|c|} \hline \multirow{4}{*}{} & genotypes & phenotypes \\ \cline { 2 - 3 } & \( X X^{C}-2 \) & Female carrier - 2 \\ \cline { 2 - 3 } & \( X Y-2 \) & Normal male - 2 \\ \hline ratio & & \\ \hline \end{tabular} 2. What is the chance of having a color blind son? \( \qquad \) 3. Is there a chance of having a color blind daughter? \( \qquad \) B) Study the Punnet square carefully. Example: \( B^{\prime} B^{\prime} \) \( B B \) M F \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|} \hline 9 & \( \hat{\theta} \) & \( B \) & \( B \) \\ \hline\( B^{\prime} \) & \( B^{\prime} B \) & \( B^{\prime} B \) \\ \hline\( B^{\prime} \) & \( B^{\prime} B \) & \( B^{\prime} B \) \\ \hline \end{tabular} \begin{tabular}{|l|c|l|} \hline & genotypes & \multicolumn{1}{|c|}{ phenotypes } \\ \cline { 2 - 3 } & \( B^{\prime} B=4 \) & \begin{tabular}{l} male will be bald \\ female will be normal \end{tabular} \\ \hline ratio & \( 4: 0 \) & \begin{tabular}{l} Male \( =100 \% \) \\ Female \( =0 \% \) \end{tabular} \\ \hline \end{tabular} Key: BB- male baldness \( B^{\prime} B^{\prime} \) - normal hair (male/female 1. What is the chance of having a son who will become bald? \( \qquad \) 2. How about the possibility of having a daughter to become bald? \( \qquad \)

View Answer
divider
BEST MATCH

Show all work for full credit. Problem 1: Given z(x) = 3x??14x³+7x²?56x?20, a. Use the Rational Zeros Theorem to find the possible rational zeros of the polynomial [2 points] b. Use synthetic division to find one zero. [4 points] c. Use synthetic division to find a second zero and write the remaining polynomial from Step 2. [4 points] d. Find the remaining zeros while using any method you choose and write the remaining polynomial from Step 3. [5 points]

View Answer
divider
BEST MATCH

Calculate landing distance in feet for a DA42 using the following information. For reference, see Introduction to Flight (ITF), Example 6.17 (page 326). The pdf of this text is posted under Modules. Exclude ground effect. No wind, paved, level, dry runway. Enter a numerical answer without units. $S_L = \frac{1.69W^2}{8\rho_o S C_{L,max} \{T_R + [D + \mu_r(W - L)]0.7V_r\}} Given: 5,000 ft DA, ISA., Weight = 3,979 lbs, V_{TD}= 141.8 ft/s (84 KTAS) C_{D0}= .039 C_L= 1.96 e = .61 b = 44 ft S = 175.3 sq. ft. \mu_B= .81

View Answer
divider
BEST MATCH

f(s) = (1-2s)/(s^2 + 4s + 5)

View Answer
divider
BEST MATCH

Put these carbocations in order of their stability starting with the least stable. 1 = least stable and 4 = most stable H \oplus H H \oplus \oplus \oplus \oplus

View Answer
divider
BEST MATCH

Texts: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A 22 10 Accounts receivable 11 Short-term investment 12 Inventory Land 13 14 Buildings and equipment 15 23 24 Assets Cash B C D F The comparative balance sheets for 2021 and 2020 and the statement of income for 2021 are given below for Wright Company. Additional information from 16 17 Liabilities 18 Accounts payable 19 Salaries payable 20 Interest payable 21 Income tax payable Notes payable Bonds payable Shareholders' Equity Less: Accumulated depreciation III + = Sheet1 $ $ 2021 42 73 40 75 50 550 (115) 715 28 2 5 9 0 160 E Statement of CF - WRIGHT COMPANY Comparative Balance Sheets December 31, 2021 and 2020 ($ in thousands) G Search 2020 30 75 15 70 60 400 (75) 575 H 35 5 3 12 30 100 J K

View Answer
divider