Which of the following best captures Huemer's objection to the argument based on the harm to others?
Question 4 options:
We don't punish people for being a bad friend, inattentive spouse, or bad coworker, so why would we punish them for doing something that may lead them to be a bad friend, inattentive spouse, etc.
The evidence that drugs cause crime is inconclusive.
Who's to say what a bad character is? Maybe morality is relative.
He points out that you can have really good friends, coworkers, etc. who use drugs.