Parks and Robertson db: Parks and Robertson state that "sexist language includes 'words, phrases, and expressions that unnecessarily differentiate between women and men or exclude, trivialize, or diminish either gender'" (such as using girl to refer to a woman) (2004, p. 233). However, many (women and men) fail to recognize or be bothered by this bias. Why is this so? The study of sports management students (2004, p. 234) shows that non-sexist language violates the sex role expectations of some students. Explore this idea. Another author (Russo, 1997) explained the violations of a man's sense of entitlement: "...anger, hostility, and even harassment and violence" (as cited in Parks and Robertson 2004, p. 234). Parks and Robertson proposed that people of either gender could see non-sexist language as such a violation. Do you agree or disagree? Explain.