based on descartes meditations and nietchzes on truth and lie in an extra moral sense Consider the relationship between words and things for Descartes and Nietzsche:
For Descartes- what kinds of things can we talk about? Are some of our descriptions of things superior to other descriptions of things, and why? What is the relationship between our words and things, or our thoughts and things, like? Does this result in some bodies of knowledge being superior to others in Descartes' account? If so, what are they?
For Nietzsche- What is the relationship between our words and things like? Why is the relationship between our words and things complicated? Does this result in some bodies of knowledge being superior to others in Nietzsche's account? Or, to rephrase that question, does Nietzsche's account of the problematic relationship between words and things come with a recommendation of what we ought to be doing, if not collecting bodies of knowledge or studying sciences?
Finally, compare Descartes' and Nietzsche's account. Is the relationship between words and things complicated for them for the same reasons? Or different but related reasons? Or completely different reasons?